2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0032-9592(03)00223-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitory peptides from sea bream scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
89
1
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
89
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Inhibition potencies of alcalase digest of skin (IC 50 0870 μg/ml) and bone (IC 50 0710 μg/ml) gelatin before fractionation were significantly higher than untreated skin (IC 50 01680 μg/ml) and bone (IC 50 01550 μg/ml) gelatin (Table 1). The ACE inhibition activity of skin and bone gelatin hydrolysates in the present study were almost similar with that of alaska pollack skin (IC 50 0629 μg/ml) , skate skin (IC 50 0680 μg/ml) (Lee et al 2011), sardinella byproduct (IC 50 0810 μg/ml) (Bougatef et al 2008) and sea bream scales (IC 50 0570 μg/ml) (Fahmi et al 2004) protein hydrolysates. Results of this study indicated that by increasing the MWCO size, ACE inhibition activity of fractions were increased.…”
Section: Degree Of Hydrolysis (%)supporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inhibition potencies of alcalase digest of skin (IC 50 0870 μg/ml) and bone (IC 50 0710 μg/ml) gelatin before fractionation were significantly higher than untreated skin (IC 50 01680 μg/ml) and bone (IC 50 01550 μg/ml) gelatin (Table 1). The ACE inhibition activity of skin and bone gelatin hydrolysates in the present study were almost similar with that of alaska pollack skin (IC 50 0629 μg/ml) , skate skin (IC 50 0680 μg/ml) (Lee et al 2011), sardinella byproduct (IC 50 0810 μg/ml) (Bougatef et al 2008) and sea bream scales (IC 50 0570 μg/ml) (Fahmi et al 2004) protein hydrolysates. Results of this study indicated that by increasing the MWCO size, ACE inhibition activity of fractions were increased.…”
Section: Degree Of Hydrolysis (%)supporting
confidence: 78%
“…Several natural ACE inhibitory peptides have been isolated from collagen and gelatin enzymatic hydrolysate of various food protein sources such as porcine skin collagen (Ichimura et al 2009), bovine skin gelatin , fish skins Nagai et al 2006;Park et al 2009), fish cartilage (Nagai et al 2006), scales (Fahmi et al 2004), squid (Alemán et al 2011) and sea cucumbers protein hydrolysates (Zhao et al 2007) as an alternative approach to the synthetic ACE inhibitory drugs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antihypertensive effects of collagen hydrolysates prepared from various sources and the isolation of several ACE inhibitory peptides from those hydrolysates have been reported in previous works (Byun Fahmi et al, 2004;Zhao et al, 2007;Saiga et al, 2008;Ichimura, Yamanaka, Otsuka, Yamashita & Maruyama, 2009). However, the use of different methods and their associated modifications to test ACE inhibitory capacity makes difficult the direct comparison of IC 50 values from different studies when some reports do not detail the number of enzyme units used in the inhibition analysis or do not include an IC 50 value for an ACE inhibitory standard such as Captopril® (Murray, Walsh & FitzGerald, 2004).…”
Section: Ace Inhibitory Activity Of Synthetically Derived Peptidesmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…However, to the best of our knowledge, ACE-inhibitory capacity has not been described in squid skin gelatin hydrolysates, although this activity has been reported in collagen and gelatin hydrolysates from other marine species (Kim, Byun, Park & Shahidi, 2001;Fahmi, Morimura, Guo, Shigematsu, Kida & Uemura, 2004;Kim & Mendis, 2006;Zhao, Li, Liu, Dong, Zhao & Zen, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Those values measured by the conventional method with HHL are also given in Table 1 for the purpose of a comparison. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The published data were over a wide range because the IC50 values were influenced by various factors, including the method conditions, the source of the enzyme, the calculation method, and the relationship between the inhibitor and the enzyme source. 1,11 Thus, it was difficult to compare the data directly, but the IC50 values recognized in this study did not differ vastly from the published data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%