2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Professional musicians listen differently to music

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
46
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
4
46
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These ratings can be made either verbally or along several dimensions (e.g., relaxation vs. arousal and/or sadness vs. happiness). The continuous rating of musical pieces is a relatively new strategy that has aided the identification of the time course of subjective experiences during music listening (Hutcherson et al, 2005; Mikutta et al, 2012, 2014; Jancke et al, 2015; Trost et al, 2015). For example, Mikutta et al (2014) instructed subjects to move a computer mouse forward when they experienced increased arousal caused by the music, independently of their affective valence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These ratings can be made either verbally or along several dimensions (e.g., relaxation vs. arousal and/or sadness vs. happiness). The continuous rating of musical pieces is a relatively new strategy that has aided the identification of the time course of subjective experiences during music listening (Hutcherson et al, 2005; Mikutta et al, 2012, 2014; Jancke et al, 2015; Trost et al, 2015). For example, Mikutta et al (2014) instructed subjects to move a computer mouse forward when they experienced increased arousal caused by the music, independently of their affective valence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subjects were instructed to click on the positions of the valence and arousal lines that best represented their actual valence and arousal ratings, respectively. As with Mikutta et al (2014), these ratings were recorded for offline analysis with a sampling rate of 100 Hz. These continuous ratings have been applied in three different ways so far: (1) continuous rating of the musical piece simultaneously during neurophysiological recording [Listening and Rating (LR)] (Hutcherson et al, 2005); (2) continuous rating during a second presentation of the musical piece, without neurophysiological recording (LR without neurophysiological recording in a second separate session) (Mikutta et al, 2012, 2013, 2014; Jancke et al, 2015; Trost et al, 2015); (3) continuous rating during the first presentation of the musical piece, without neurophysiological recording (LR without neurophysiological recording in an initial separate session).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Musicians are more used to engaging in those cognitive exercises utilized for musical analyses and online temporal processing (North & Hargreaves, 1997), and thus background music has an increased threshold for meaningful processing in musicians compared to in non-musicians (Mikutta et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%