Typologische Konstruktionen 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-21011-3_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Professionelle Sichtweisen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, of the papers whose first-round submission happened in the year 2015, we had 48 submissions eventually accepted (i.e., possibly after revisions), while 9 2 We do get such papers, and we reject them via an editorial precheck. We assume that we get fewer such papers than other journals, but we simply do not have comparison data as other journals in our field do not share their data.…”
Section: Submission Numbers and Acceptance Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So, of the papers whose first-round submission happened in the year 2015, we had 48 submissions eventually accepted (i.e., possibly after revisions), while 9 2 We do get such papers, and we reject them via an editorial precheck. We assume that we get fewer such papers than other journals, but we simply do not have comparison data as other journals in our field do not share their data.…”
Section: Submission Numbers and Acceptance Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More details about the process, rationales, and experiences can be found in [3,5]. The Semantic Web journal is in the meantime, arguably, the most prominent journal in its field [1,2], thus providing empirical evidence that an open and transparent review process can be installed without jeopardizing quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%