2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2018.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Effect of CD20 Expression in Adult B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the prognostic analysis of the present study, CD20 expression was found to be associated with unfavorable outcomes in the pro-B-ALL cohort. Although the prognostic impact of CD20 expression on patients’ outcomes remains controversial [3138], our data suggest that the combination of rituximab with current chemotherapy may be necessary for these patients. In addition, carrying KMT2A rearrangement and high MRD at day 78 were shown to be independent prognostic factors of pro-B-ALL in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the prognostic analysis of the present study, CD20 expression was found to be associated with unfavorable outcomes in the pro-B-ALL cohort. Although the prognostic impact of CD20 expression on patients’ outcomes remains controversial [3138], our data suggest that the combination of rituximab with current chemotherapy may be necessary for these patients. In addition, carrying KMT2A rearrangement and high MRD at day 78 were shown to be independent prognostic factors of pro-B-ALL in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, the definition of CD20 positivity with a cutoff of 20% was based on the traditional assessment that divided patients into 5 groups by the intensity of surface marker expression: negative, less than the 25th percentile, 25th to 50th percentiles, 50th to 75th percentiles, and more than the 75th percentile of the fluorescence intensity 31 . With the traditional cutoff of CD20 at 20%, several groups reported an association between high CD20 expression and worse outcome 1,14,15,32,33 . Although low CD20 expression (<20%) is associated with favorable outcomes, patients with CD20 expression of 1% to 19% may benefit from the addition of an anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibody to conventional therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 With the traditional cutoff of CD20 at 20%, several groups reported an association between high CD20 expression and worse outcome. 1,14,15,32,33 Although low CD20 expression (<20%) is associated with favorable outcomes, patients with CD20 expression of 1% to 19% may benefit from the addition of an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody to conventional therapy.…”
Section: Outcome In the Cd20 < 20% Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of interest, CD20 is upregulated on B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia blast cells by corticosteroids, suggesting that a relationship between benefit from rituximab and baseline CD20 3 cannot necessarily be anticipated. Additionally, higher levels of cell surface CD20 expression have been identified by some studies as an adverse prognostic biomarker in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 although several studies do not concur. 9 , 10 , 11 This is an important consideration, because studies that recruited patients with higher CD20 expression might have selected a subset of patients with a worse prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%