Prognostic factors in patients with thyroid carcinoma: a competing-risks analysis

Abstract

Background: Cox proportional-hazards models are widely used to describe survival trends and identify prognostic factors for thyroid carcinoma, but the prognostic model is not accurate enough. This study therefore used a competing-risks model to identify the significant prognostic factors for different types of thyroid carcinoma.Methods: We identified 38,444 eligible patients in the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result) database. The potential prognostic factors for thyroid carcinoma were analyzed by Cox regression analysis, cause-specific hazard function (CS) analysis, and subdistribution hazard function (SD).Results: Cox regression analysis, CS analysis and SD analysis found identifying age, being unmarried, no regional lymph nodes examined, AJCC-6 II, III, IV vs I , having follicular, medullary, anaplastic vs Papillary carcinomas, no surgery, no radioiodine, liver metastasis, and lung metastasis as the significant risk factors for thyroid carcinoma, while being female was protective factor. However, the results from the three multivariate models for being black, tumor size >1 cm, and brain metastasis were inconsistent.Conclusion: In addition to finding that age, pathological type, tumor size, AJCC-6 stage, surgery status, radioiodine status, metastasis as common factors affected the prognosis, we also found that women, being unmarried and had their regional lymph nodes examined can improve the prognosis of thyroid cancer. The discovery of these factors will provide evidences for the prevention and treatment of thyroid cancer.