2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
322
11
17

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 413 publications
(378 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
28
322
11
17
Order By: Relevance
“…14 of the remaining 35 studies (Kim et al, 2006;Murakami et al, 2008;Balentine et al, 2010;Chu et al, 2010;Kanda et al, 2010;de Jong et al, 2011;Jamieson et al, 2011;Kneuertz et al, 2011;Maithel et al, 2011;Singal et al, 2011;Chatterjee et al, 2012;Watanabe et al, 2012;Xie et al, 2012;Fisher et al, 2013) were excluded because they were reported by the same institutions as other studies. 21 studies (Ozaki et al, 1999;Mitsunaga et al, 2005;Nakagohri et al, 2006;Pawlik et al, 2007;Kazanjian et al, 2008;Kato et al, 2009;Nagai et al, 2009;Sergeant et al, 2009;Ben et al, 2010;Murakami et al, 2010;Bachellier et al, 2011;Kim et al, 2011;Schiffman et al, 2011;Cheng et al, 2012;Jamieson et al, 2012;Lee et al, 2012;Murata et al, 2012;Sahin et al, 2012;Takahashi et al, 2012;Turrini et al, 2013;Xie et al, 2013) were included in the final meta-analysis, comprising one case matched controlled study and 20 retrospective cohort studies (Table 1). A total of 4459 patients were included in this meta-analysis.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14 of the remaining 35 studies (Kim et al, 2006;Murakami et al, 2008;Balentine et al, 2010;Chu et al, 2010;Kanda et al, 2010;de Jong et al, 2011;Jamieson et al, 2011;Kneuertz et al, 2011;Maithel et al, 2011;Singal et al, 2011;Chatterjee et al, 2012;Watanabe et al, 2012;Xie et al, 2012;Fisher et al, 2013) were excluded because they were reported by the same institutions as other studies. 21 studies (Ozaki et al, 1999;Mitsunaga et al, 2005;Nakagohri et al, 2006;Pawlik et al, 2007;Kazanjian et al, 2008;Kato et al, 2009;Nagai et al, 2009;Sergeant et al, 2009;Ben et al, 2010;Murakami et al, 2010;Bachellier et al, 2011;Kim et al, 2011;Schiffman et al, 2011;Cheng et al, 2012;Jamieson et al, 2012;Lee et al, 2012;Murata et al, 2012;Sahin et al, 2012;Takahashi et al, 2012;Turrini et al, 2013;Xie et al, 2013) were included in the final meta-analysis, comprising one case matched controlled study and 20 retrospective cohort studies (Table 1). A total of 4459 patients were included in this meta-analysis.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perineural invasion(PNI), which was described as the spread of cancer cells in the perineural spaces of the nerves (Kayahara et al, 2007;Liebig et al, 2009), has been reported as one of the sources of local recurrence in resected pancreatic cancer (Pour et al, 2003). And PNI is regarded as a prominent characteristic of pancreatic cancer, because the incidence of PNI is particularly high in pancreatic cancer among varied cancers (Bapat et al,Jun-Feng Zhang & , Rong Hua*, Yong-Wei Sun, Wei Liu, Yan-Miao Huo, De-Jun Liu & , Jiao Li several studies showed that PNI was not a prognostic parameter (Pawlik et al, 2007;Schiffman et al, 2011;Jamieson et al, 2012;Turrini et al, 2013). A systematic review (Garcea et al, 2008) analysed studies detailing outcomes following resection for PDAC from 1980 to 2008 and showed that meta-analysis of yearly survival data for PNI did not achieve statistical significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased tumor size, 12 positive lymph node metastasis, 13 increased lymph node ratio, 14 high tumor grade, 15 positive lymphovascular 16 or perineural invasion, 17 and positive margin-status 18 represent aggressive tumor behaviors in pancreatic cancer that lead to early treatment failure and resistance to conventional chemotherapy. Determining these prognostic factors is a key component of developing an effective and reasonable treatment strategy based on accurate cancer biologic behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated that the effects of LNR staging is superior to that of pN staging in predicting prognosis of patients for many cancer sites: colon (Chen et al, 2011), gastric (Wang et al, 2011;Yu et al, 2011), pancreas (Pawlik et al, 2007;Keck et al, 2012), esophagus (Greenstein et al, 2008), corpus uteri (Chan et al, 2007) and bladder (Herr, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%