2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic value of the optimal measurement location of on-site CT-derived fractional flow reserve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The C FFR was significantly higher at the maximum point of stenosis than distal to the stenosis. These results are in line with the studies by Nozaki Y. et al and Kueh S. et al, who showed that a C FFR measured 1–2 cm distal to a target stenosis is more consistent with the decision for revascularization than measured at the maximum point of the stenosis 34 35 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The C FFR was significantly higher at the maximum point of stenosis than distal to the stenosis. These results are in line with the studies by Nozaki Y. et al and Kueh S. et al, who showed that a C FFR measured 1–2 cm distal to a target stenosis is more consistent with the decision for revascularization than measured at the maximum point of the stenosis 34 35 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“… 1 A study also demonstrated that greater ∆FFR CT is associated with an increase in cardiovascular events. 2 Our patient’s distal FFR CT and ∆FFR CT improved after lipid-lowering therapy, suggesting the usefulness of FFR CT for clinically assessing improvement in coronary ischemia with lipid-lowering therapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The details regarding the computation and how onsite processing was performed are provided in the online appendix. Lesion-specific CT-FFR value was measured 1–2 cm distal to the lesion for all coronary stenosis on major epicardial vessels with diameter ≥ 2 mm [ 28 ]. Vessel-specific CT-FFR was defined as the CT-FFR value for the most distal lesion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%