1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60513-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress in 3D Surface Microtopography Characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, surfaces are complex entities which cannot be described completely by a single or even a few numerical descriptors [6]. Numerous numerical parameters have been proposed in the past most of which are now redundant [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, surfaces are complex entities which cannot be described completely by a single or even a few numerical descriptors [6]. Numerous numerical parameters have been proposed in the past most of which are now redundant [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very little progress has been made in this area except where a excellent correlation model has been developed, by which the functionalities and the surface geometric characteristics are connected. In the recent few years, some generic methods have been suggested or used, such as parameter classification [6,8], Analysis of Variances (ANOVA) and correlation analysis [9]. In this case study, the ANOVA method is adopted as a tool to show functional correlation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The abrasive tool active surface measurement can be performed using contact profile-meters [24]. Currently, to measure the grinding wheel active surface, non-contact methods are widely used, including: scanning electron microscopy [8], optical microscopy [9], interference microscopy [10], and laser scanning microscopy [25].…”
Section: Measuring Abrasive Tool Active Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…7) generated on the machined surface [2,3]. The maximum depth of valleys is between 0.35 and 0.55 μm and their widths 0.08 and 0.16 μm depending on the sequence of machining operations performed.…”
Section: Characterization Of Function-related Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Special attention in this area has been given during two past decades to the standardization of 3D set roughness parameters [1][2][3]. Precision machining with Rz=2.5-4 μm and high-precision machining with Rz<1 μm of hardened steels (45-60 HRC) with ultrahard cutting tool materials have been developed with a special interest to automotive, hydraulic, and die and mold industry sectors [4,5] due to high flexibility, possible complete machining, lesser ecological impact, and higher MRR [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%