2009
DOI: 10.2172/972322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress on Nuclear Data Covariances: AFCI-1.2 Covariance Library

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[94] Table 16 shows the relative uncertainties of the main integral parameters of a series of fast systems: ABR metal and oxide fuel cores, a SFR with low TRU conversion ratio, the sodium-cooled European Fast Reactor (EFR), a GFR, a LFR, and an accelerator-driven minor actinide burner (ADMAB). [95] The uncertainties were estimated using the AFCI-1.2 cross section covariance data [96]. The estimated multiplication factor uncertainties were significantly larger than the targeted prediction accuracy for Generation-IV systems [97]; it is above 1% for all systems considered and for SFR and ADMAB, it is above 2% because of the high content of minor actinides.…”
Section: Perturbation Theory and Uncertainty Analysis Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[94] Table 16 shows the relative uncertainties of the main integral parameters of a series of fast systems: ABR metal and oxide fuel cores, a SFR with low TRU conversion ratio, the sodium-cooled European Fast Reactor (EFR), a GFR, a LFR, and an accelerator-driven minor actinide burner (ADMAB). [95] The uncertainties were estimated using the AFCI-1.2 cross section covariance data [96]. The estimated multiplication factor uncertainties were significantly larger than the targeted prediction accuracy for Generation-IV systems [97]; it is above 1% for all systems considered and for SFR and ADMAB, it is above 2% because of the high content of minor actinides.…”
Section: Perturbation Theory and Uncertainty Analysis Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After review, uncertainties were increased in the threshold region following dispersion analysis (see AFCI-1.2 report [1]). We gave due consideration to users' comments on elastic and inelastic uncertainties and tended towards conservative estimates whenever possible.…”
Section: -Fe 56-fe 57-fe (#13-15)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that 55 Mn is almost pure scatterer, meaning that Γ n >> Γ γ , hence ∆Γ γ = δΓ γ /Γ γ defines the average capture cross section uncertainty ∆σ γ . A comparison is made with the uncertainties given in AFCI-1.2 library [14]. This library is produced in 33-energy group representation, mostly with groups of the same lethargy 0.5, starting in reverse order with group 1 (19.6 MeV -10 MeV), down through group 22 (454 eV -304 eV) to group 33 (10…”
Section: Covariancesmentioning
confidence: 99%