2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress on Sustainable Development Goal indicators in 707 districts of India: a quantitative mid-line assessment using the National Family Health Surveys, 2016 and 2021

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It might be too early to make conclusive comment on the success or the failure of ADP. Using NFHS 4 and 5 data, Subramanian et al (2023) 36 assessed the progress of Indian districts in terms of achievement of 33 Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) indicators by 2030. Their findings suggest no clear pattern that AD's are more likely to meet the SDG targets compared to other districts though they admit the possibility of Covid-19 related disruptions during the intervening survey periods could have influenced the outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It might be too early to make conclusive comment on the success or the failure of ADP. Using NFHS 4 and 5 data, Subramanian et al (2023) 36 assessed the progress of Indian districts in terms of achievement of 33 Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) indicators by 2030. Their findings suggest no clear pattern that AD's are more likely to meet the SDG targets compared to other districts though they admit the possibility of Covid-19 related disruptions during the intervening survey periods could have influenced the outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…India needs to work with 19 out of the 33 SDG indicators but only 75% of the targets achieved by 2021. The states Madhya Pradesh (MP), Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Bihar, and Odisha have not achieved the target in cent percent, [58,59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a published method to estimate progress toward the SDG targets for each state and UT. 24 This method assumes that the SAC between 2016 and 2021 is maintained until 2030 and classifies each state and UT into 1 of 4 categories for each outcome: achieved-I (goal already met in 2021 and will continue to be met in 2030), achieved-II (goal already met in 2021 but will no longer maintain status by 2030), on-target (goal not met in 2021 but will be met by 2030), and off-target (goal not met in 2021 and will not be met by 2030). The SDG only sets targets for NMR (12 deaths per 1000 live births) and under-5 mortality rate (25 deaths per 1000 live births).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%