Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation

Mayer, Tom G.; Barnes, Dennis; Nichols, Gerry; Kishino, Nancy D.; Coval, Kathy; Piel, Barbara; Hoshino, Dennis; Gatchel, Robert J.

doi:10.1097/00007632-198809000-00006

Cited by 90 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The PILE assesses an individual’s capacity to perform repetitive lifting tasks, a critical aspect of functional performance, especially for those with CLBP [ 75 ]. Despite the proven benefits of WBV in enhancing muscle strength and endurance, the impact on lifting capacity as measured by PILE has shown mixed results.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Whole-Body Vibration Exercise on Pain, Disability, Balance, Proprioception, Functional Performance and Quality of Life in People with Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Zafar,

Zaki,

Alam

et al. 2024

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) presents significant treatment challenges due to its multifactorial nature. Whole-body vibration exercise (WBVE) has emerged as a potential therapeutic modality, offering benefits across various domains, including pain reduction, improved balance, and enhanced quality of life (QoL). The aim of this present systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the effects of WBVE on pain, disability, balance, proprioception, functional performance, and QoL in individuals with NSCLBP. Methods: We comprehensively searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases from October 2023 to January 2024, including RCTs with a PEDro score of ≥5 for high-quality evidence. Outcome measures included pain intensity, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) score, balance, proprioception, functional performance (through a progressive iso-inertial lifting evaluation), and QoL (SF-36) in NSCLBP patients. The risk of bias was assessed using ROB-2, and the certainty of evidence for each outcome indicator was analyzed using GRADE. A meta-analysis was conducted using standardized mean differences (SMD) and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. Results: Ten randomized controlled trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the systematic review, and nine were suitable for the meta-analysis. The qualitative synthesis revealed WBVE is effective in improving pain, disability, balance, proprioception, and functional performance and QoL. Further, the results of the quantitative review demonstrated WBVE significantly reduced pain [visual analogue scale: SMD = −0.81, 95% CI (−1.11, −0.50), I2 = 0%, p < 0.01], disability [ODI: MD = −3.78, 95% CI (−5.27, −2.29), I2 = 24%, p < 0.01]; RMDQ: MD = −1.43, 95% CI (−2.04, −0.82), I2 = 51%, p < 0.01], balance [SMD = −0.28, 95% CI (−0.52, −0.05), I2 = 0%, p = 0.02], and proprioception [SMD = −4.20, 95% CI (−7.50, −0.89), I2 = 99%, p = 0.01]. Conclusions: This review and meta-analysis indicate that WBVE significantly improves pain, disability, balance and proprioception in individuals with non-specific chronic low back pain. These findings suggest potential benefits of incorporating WBVE into the management strategies for NSCLBP.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%