Project delivery system selection of construction projects in China

Chen, Yong Qiang; Liu, Jun Ying; Li, Bingguang; Lin, Bin

doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.10.008

Cited by 78 publications

(68 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While no project delivery option is perfect, one option may be better suited than another based on the unique requirements of a particular project [46]. Since owners have a number of objectives in terms of cost, schedule, quality, and level of control when deciding on the project delivery method, PDM selection is a problem with multiple objectives [19] and is not an easy task [12].…”

Section: Project Delivery Methods Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is generally accepted that the PDM should be selected taking into account all kinds of important factors for a given project. Several studies have concentrated on decision methods of PDM selection based on an analysis of selection factors [7,12,13], but different factors are identified from different perspectives, and sometimes the factors may not be directly related to project objectives, thus making the corresponding results unconvincing.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Framework for Designing Project Delivery and Contract Strategy in Chinese Construction Industry Based on Value‐Added Analysis

Ding

Wang

2018

Advances in Civil Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A project delivery method (PDM) and project contract strategy (PCS) are two critical factors for project success in construction industry. Currently, there are several options available for them in the construction industry, with several innovative PDMs and PCSs emerging along with the development of the industry. is paper maintains that the PDM should be designed in combination with the PCS given their close relationship. is paper focuses on the design of project delivery and contract strategy (PDCS), with the aim of developing a conceptual framework for the PDCS design. e design process is divided into two stages: preliminary design and detailed design, taking engineering design as a frame of reference. In the design process, the value-added analysis of project objectives is adopted as a tool to make decisions at different stages. e framework proposed in this paper is intended to provide a more distinct and direct path to improving PDCS selection or design, as well as enhancing the reliability of decision-making.

show abstract

Section: Project Delivery Methods Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Framework for Designing Project Delivery and Contract Strategy in Chinese Construction Industry Based on Value‐Added Analysis

Ding

Wang

2018

Advances in Civil Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A number of studies have discussed the selection of a PDS through the quantitative approach [1,9,10,13,26,27]. But limited studies have discussed the selection of PDSs through the qualitative approach.…”

Section: Previous Research On Pds Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…With respect to the quantitative approach, many authors use the analytical hierarchy process in their research to propose models or frameworks to assist in PDS selection [1,9,13,26]. To improve the precision of PDS selection in a quantitative approach, a research study managed to combine artificial neural network and data envelopment analysis in their PDS selection model [10]. Moreover, a number of researchers used performance metrics comparison as part of their quantitative analysis to select a suitable PDS [14,28].…”

Section: Previous Research On Pds Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Construction Project Delivery System Selection Framework: Professional Service Firms’ Perspective

Mosly¹

2016

JCEA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:There is a variety of PDSs (project delivery systems) in today's construction industry. This leads to confusion when it comes to selecting the most suitable PDS for a specific project. The wrong selection decision might lead eventually to reduced profit margins or perhaps financial losses to PSFs (professional service firms). This research proposes a conceptual framework that helps PSFs in the selection of one or more suitable PDSs for their construction operations. The framework uses SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analysis as a tool for assessing each PDS considered in this research. The PDSs included in the framework are design-bid-build, design-build, construction management agency, public-private partnerships and integrated project delivery. The main aim of this research framework is to enhance decision-making efficiency in PDS selection for PSF operations.

show abstract

“…Change of material type and specification during construction (X15) [16] 16. Schedule delay (X16) [22,23] …”

Section: Introduction Of Key Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Applying multiple attribute decision-making methods to solve the problematic selection of living environment

Chu¹,

Chiang²,

Perng³

2018

Proceedings of the 2017 3rd International Forum on Energy, Environment Science and Materials (IFEESM 2017)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The selection of an ideal living environment is a complex process that involves multiple attributes, which makes the decision of an appropriate living environment difficult. Hence, a suitable assessment model is needed to solve the complexity. The multiple attribute decision-making methods-Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)-were the multiple attribute decision-making methods applied to determine the assessment criteria for the selection of living environment. By using FDM, the criteria for living the selection were determined. Subsequently, AHP was applied to ensure the consistency of each factor, that way an objective and accurate assessment tool for living area selection can be developed. The results show that the most significant factors are environments, followed by designs. Building constructions are less significant. Moreover, it was found in the study that community welfare is neglected. Therefore, it is suggested that (1) related authorities should strengthen community welfare and neighborhood development and that (2) social resources should be integrated in order to deliver social welfare and services to the community, allowing the people in the community to acquire the necessary resources and assistance.

show abstract

Project delivery system selection of construction projects in China

Cited by 78 publications

References 29 publications

Framework for Designing Project Delivery and Contract Strategy in Chinese Construction Industry Based on Value‐Added Analysis

Framework for Designing Project Delivery and Contract Strategy in Chinese Construction Industry Based on Value‐Added Analysis

Construction Project Delivery System Selection Framework: Professional Service Firms’ Perspective

Applying multiple attribute decision-making methods to solve the problematic selection of living environment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About