2017
DOI: 10.7146/aul.280.195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Project Half Double Current Results of Phase 1 and Phase 2, December 2017

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This report extends results from three earlier reports about PHD Svejvig, Rode, et al, 2017;Svejvig, Adland, et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This report extends results from three earlier reports about PHD Svejvig, Rode, et al, 2017;Svejvig, Adland, et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Sixth, although data availability has increased substantially in this report compared to earlier reports Svejvig, Rode, et al, 2017;Svejvig, Adland, et al, 2017), in some cases collection of the necessary data has not been possible. In other cases, data availability and access are vast.…”
Section: Rhythm In Key Eventsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data analysis is divided into two parts: The first part consists of a highly structured approach using the comparison framework for mapping pilot projects and reference projects. The result is documented in a report for each organization (confidential) and three reports publically available , Svejvig et al 2017a, Svejvig et al 2017b. This first part of the analysis is used to determine to what degree the pilot projects was able to accelerate impact as shown in Table 4, and is based on comparing selected key performance indicators between pilot project and reference projects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%