2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2015.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promiscuity and selectivity of bitter molecules and their receptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
99
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
5
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, the current work demonstrated that chemical modification of TAS2R14 agonists allows to probe the spatial capacity of the binding pocket: the receptor TAS2R14 is able to accommodate agonists with a wide range of sizes, as typical for multispecific GPCRs (36), indicating that agonist-receptor contact points do not envelop the ligand tightly. This is in agreement with the finding that TAS2R promiscuity correlates with the binding site surface (37). Future work elucidating the contact points between TAS2R14 binding site residues and its agonists is necessary to reveal the molecular basis for the promiscuity of this receptor aside from its apparent spacious ligand binding site.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In summary, the current work demonstrated that chemical modification of TAS2R14 agonists allows to probe the spatial capacity of the binding pocket: the receptor TAS2R14 is able to accommodate agonists with a wide range of sizes, as typical for multispecific GPCRs (36), indicating that agonist-receptor contact points do not envelop the ligand tightly. This is in agreement with the finding that TAS2R promiscuity correlates with the binding site surface (37). Future work elucidating the contact points between TAS2R14 binding site residues and its agonists is necessary to reveal the molecular basis for the promiscuity of this receptor aside from its apparent spacious ligand binding site.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The fact that greater concentrations of the ligands were able to cause GLP-1 release with decreased receptor expression indicates that either these ligands also interact with other receptors to cause GLP-1 release or that only a small fraction of receptors are necessary to provide a full response. The former is consistent with the knowledge compiled on bitter taste receptors and their ligands about the promiscuity of these receptors and their ligands [41]. The fact that Z7 molecule caused GLP-1 responses provides a strong validation of our computational modeling methods for discovering novel ligands.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…[29,30] The functional screening of human TAS2Rs has so far resulted in the identification of bitter agonists for 21 of the 25 receptors Moreover, it became evident that TAS2Rs recognize a highly variable number of structurally diverse bitter compounds ranging from single or few compounds to dozens. [31][32][33][34] These differences in tuning breadths suggest that receptors may contribute disproportionally to human bitter sensing. Among the three most broadly tuned receptors, TAS2R10, [35] TAS2R14, [36] and TAS2R46, [37] the TAS2R14 exhibits to date the largest panel of identified bitter agonists, which frequently represent drugs with profound pharmacological activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28] On the tongue, subsets of TAS2R genes are co-expressed in bitter taste receptor cells that represent a subpopulation of type II cells within taste buds. [31][32][33][34] These differences in tuning breadths suggest that receptors may contribute disproportionally to human bitter sensing. [31][32][33][34] These differences in tuning breadths suggest that receptors may contribute disproportionally to human bitter sensing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%