Promoting Government Impacts through Open Data: Key Influential Factors

Yerden, Xiaoyi; Luna‐Reyes, Luis F.

doi:10.1145/3463677.3463711

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Section: Law and Policymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Policy frameworks are described as conducive to establishing and using Open Data [11,18,22,62]. In this context, a discernible political will for Open Data and the support and commitment of political leadership are essential [11,62]. Further, there are external constraints and constellations of pressure from international organizations and standards [11,47].…”

Section: Law and Policymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Prepared access is crucial, especially for technically inexperienced users [61]. The available equipment must be supportive and good [62]. The interfaces must enable and support interaction and management with the data [41].…”

Section: Technical Infrastructurementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The structure and characteristics of the data represent significant factors that can favor further uses [22]. It is essential to ensure data quality [11,62]. Further, data quality standards according to FAIR principles represent a conducive data structure for Open Data processes [6,18,31].…”

Section: Data Structurementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A Scoping Review on Analysis of the Barriers and Support Factors of Open Data

Lichtenauer,

Schmidbauer,

Wilhelm

et al. 2023

Information

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Using personal data as Open Data is a pervasive topic globally, spanning various sectors and disciplines. Recent technological advancements, particularly in artificial intelligence and algorithm-driven analysis, have significantly expanded the capacity for the automated analysis of vast datasets. There’s an expectation that Open Data analysis can drive innovation, enhance services, and streamline administrative processes. However, this necessitates a legally and ethically sound framework alongside intelligent technical tools to comprehensively analyze data for societal benefit. Methodology: A systematic review across seven databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, BASE, LIVIVO, Web of Science, IEEExplore, and ACM) was conducted to assess the current research on barriers, support factors, and options for the anonymized processing of personal data as Open Data. Additionally, a supplementary search was performed in Google Scholar. A total of n=1192 studies were identified, and n=55 met the inclusion criteria through a multi-stage selection process for further analysis. Results: Fourteen potential supporting factors (n=14) and thirteen barriers (n=13) to the provision and anonymization of personal data were identified. These encompassed technical prerequisites as well as institutional, personnel, ethical, and legal considerations. These findings offer insights into existing obstacles and supportive structures within Open Data processes for effective implementation.

show abstract