2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2018.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propanol – Sugar aqueous biphasic systems as a suitable platform for biomolecules extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clouding (liquid–liquid demixing) phase diagrams for ternary systems of 1-butanol in aqueous amino acid/IL/poly­(ethylene glycol) (PEG)/propanol solutions were determined by the visual turbidity titration method. The methods’ procedure and apparatus details have been explained in our previous works. ,, Here, to determine 1-butanol mass fraction corresponding to the clouding phenomenon at each temperature (283.1–353.1 K with an increase of 10 K), binary aqueous solutions of the investigated additives {amino acids (0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 mol·kg –1 ), ILs (0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 mol·kg –1 ), polymers (0.05, 0.10, and 0.15 w/w), and 1-/2-propanol (0.05, 0.10, and 0.15 w/w)} were first prepared and poured into a transparent double-walled glass cell. Then, pure 1-butanol was dripped on each binary limpid solution until a cloudy mixture was detected at each temperature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The clouding (liquid–liquid demixing) phase diagrams for ternary systems of 1-butanol in aqueous amino acid/IL/poly­(ethylene glycol) (PEG)/propanol solutions were determined by the visual turbidity titration method. The methods’ procedure and apparatus details have been explained in our previous works. ,, Here, to determine 1-butanol mass fraction corresponding to the clouding phenomenon at each temperature (283.1–353.1 K with an increase of 10 K), binary aqueous solutions of the investigated additives {amino acids (0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 mol·kg –1 ), ILs (0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 mol·kg –1 ), polymers (0.05, 0.10, and 0.15 w/w), and 1-/2-propanol (0.05, 0.10, and 0.15 w/w)} were first prepared and poured into a transparent double-walled glass cell. Then, pure 1-butanol was dripped on each binary limpid solution until a cloudy mixture was detected at each temperature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous studies have shown that infinite dilution activity coefficients of C1−C4 alcohols follows the trend 1-butanol> 2-butanol > 1-propanol > 2-propanol > ethanol > methanol, indicating the lower hydrophilicity of primary alcohols, compared to the secondary alcohols, for the same numbers of carbon atoms. 27,51,52 Moreover, it has been proved that more hydrophilic sugars are needed to solute out 2-propanol and form sugar + 2-propanol ABSs, as compared with that to form sugar + 1-propanol ABSs, confirming that 2-propanol is more hydrophilic than 1propanol. 27 Therefore, it can be said that because of its more hydrophilic nature, 2-propanol acts more successfully as a bridge between water and 1-butanol and more effectively reconciles 1butanol with water, as compared with 1-propanol.…”
Section: T H I S C O N T E N T Imentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The trend was in agreement with the sugaring-out ability and hydrophilicity of the sugars investigated. It has been reported that the ability of these sugars in sugaring-out ionic liquids (Ferreira et al 2016), polymers (Sadeghi et al 2016), and alcohols (Ebrahimi and Sadeghi 2018) for the formation of ABS increased in the order of glucose < sucrose < maltose. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Binodal Curves Of Sugaring-out Assisted Absmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sugars possess several hydroxyl groups with dual donor/acceptor characteristics that can participate in hydrogen bonding, thereby exerting a sugaring-out effect (also known as soluting-out effect) inherently (de Brito Cardoso et al 2013). Rising attention has been given to the application of carbohydrates as a sugaring-out agent to form polymer/sugar ABS (Sadeghi et al 2016), acetonitrile/sugar ABS (de Brito Cardoso et al 2013), ionic liquid (IL)/sugar ABS (Quental et al 2018) and alcohol/sugar ABS (Ebrahimi and Sadeghi 2018). The viscosity of alcohol is lower when compared to polymers and ILs, allowing more rapid phase separation and e cient mass transfer of biomolecules from one phase to another (Wang et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%