2008 5th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/ccnc08.2007.59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposal on Wide Area DLNA Communication System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This communication paradigm is not cost-effective due to its significant expense in processing and communication resources, and slow response time. Even though existing methods extend home services outside the home by relaying or tunneling in-home UPnP/DLNA messages to remote devices (Kawamoto et al, 2009;Kim et al, 2007;Motegi et al, 2008;Song et al, 2009), these problems remain and become worse in wide area networks. As Section 5 mentions, experimental results show that the UPnP/ DLNA-specific SOAP control scheme creates a severe performance reduction in a wide-area network compared with that in a local network.…”
Section: Observation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This communication paradigm is not cost-effective due to its significant expense in processing and communication resources, and slow response time. Even though existing methods extend home services outside the home by relaying or tunneling in-home UPnP/DLNA messages to remote devices (Kawamoto et al, 2009;Kim et al, 2007;Motegi et al, 2008;Song et al, 2009), these problems remain and become worse in wide area networks. As Section 5 mentions, experimental results show that the UPnP/ DLNA-specific SOAP control scheme creates a severe performance reduction in a wide-area network compared with that in a local network.…”
Section: Observation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Third, inside connected VPNs have the problem of no privacy and access control (Song et al, 2009). Therefore, Motegi et al (2008) and Song et al (2009) proposed different UPnP/DLNA proxies without regard to SIP and VPN concerns. Furthermore, Kawamoto et al (2009) and Venkitaraman (2008) employed special peer-to-peer (P2P) overlay architectures on home gateways, among which the content search and retrieval operations comply with the P2P's conventions without loss of generality.…”
Section: Related Research On Home Serversmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, research work has been focusing, for quite some time, on how to extend this functionality to devices outside the core home network. For example, in [9] the authors propose a system that expands the interconnection area from a home network to a mobile phone, and a similar solution is presented in [14]. In [13] a solution that utilizes the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) is suggested for linking individual remote devices to a DLNA-AV based home network, while the solution presented in [1] targets the same with the usage of the Atom publishing protocol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In correspondence to these situations, more consumer electronics such as Digital Living Network Alliance (DLNA) [1] capable televisions or digital video recorders are being introduced into the market. In the next stage of home network services, connecting two home networks with VPN to enjoy digital contents is no longer a future usage scenario but a realistic situation even for ordinary users [2] [3]. VPN services for home networks require a stable broadband connection, as in enterprise services, since many audio/visual appliances transfer high-quality digital content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%