2018
DOI: 10.1128/aac.02042-17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Trial on the Use of Trough Concentration versus Area under the Curve To Determine Therapeutic Vancomycin Dosing

Abstract: We hypothesized that dosing vancomycin to achieve trough concentrations of >15 mg/liter overdoses many adults compared to area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)-guided dosing. We conducted a 3-year, prospective study of vancomycin dosing, plasma concentrations, and outcomes. In year 1, nonstudy clinicians targeted trough concentrations of 10 to 20 mg/liter (infection dependent) and controlled dosing. In years 2 and 3, the study team controlled vancomycin dosing with BestDose Bayesian software to achieve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

21
309
2
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 302 publications
(340 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
21
309
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with other data, a large percentage of patients had adequate AUC with troughs lower than 15 mg/L. Another study evaluated BestDose with collection of a single vancomycin level . AUC‐guided dosing resulted in shorter durations of therapy, less nephrotoxicity, and lower troughs while maintaining similar efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In agreement with other data, a large percentage of patients had adequate AUC with troughs lower than 15 mg/L. Another study evaluated BestDose with collection of a single vancomycin level . AUC‐guided dosing resulted in shorter durations of therapy, less nephrotoxicity, and lower troughs while maintaining similar efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The authors report that 97% (36 of 37 patients) reached therapeutic goals for sirolimus after 2 to 3 months of therapy. They noted several important lessons from such a study design, which we have also noted in our own work . First, scheduled samples (eg, trough concentrations) are often not obtained at the correct time under routine clinical circumstances, which is why traditional TDM that relies on exact timing and comparison to therapeutic ranges is less robust than model‐based TDM that can handle such deviations from planned sample times.…”
Section: Clinical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 90%
“…They noted several important lessons from such a study design, which we have also noted in our own work. 49 First, scheduled samples (eg, trough concentrations) are often not obtained at the correct time under routine clinical circumstances, which is why traditional TDM that relies on exact timing and comparison to therapeutic ranges is less robust than model-based TDM that can handle such deviations from planned sample times. Second, there is usually greater within-individual variability in clinical patient populations than in study populations.…”
Section: Clinical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although approximately half of adult patients may need trough concentrations >15 mg/L to ensure efficacy, the other half do not, and maintaining trough concentrations in this range puts these patients at undue risk of nephrotoxicity . This concept serves as the basis of continuous infusion vancomycin, and recent clinical data demonstrate reduced vancomycin‐associated nephrotoxicity in patients monitored by AUC relative to those monitored by trough concentrations of 15‐20 mg/L …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach to the logarithmic trapezoidal rule is the use of Bayesian software programs to estimate vancomycin AUC 24h from a single serum concentration . This approach has been shown to estimate AUC 24h from trough‐only sampling with 97% accuracy and has also been applied clinically, resulting in reduced vancomycin‐associated nephrotoxicity . Although this approach typically requires only a single vancomycin concentration, it should be noted that its accuracy depends on the population pharmacokinetic model used as the Bayesian prior and the patient population to which it is applied .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%