Prospective validation of a core curriculum progress assimilation instrument for radiation oncology residentship

Mauro, Geovanne Pedro; Najas, Gabriel Faria; Carvalho, Heloísa A.; Villar, R.C.

doi:10.1016/j.rpor.2020.09.003

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Taken together, the knowledge scores increased over the years. 10,35 Concerning the relationship between the progress and CBO tests, our results were partially in concordance with those of previous studies. For example, in an undergraduate context, a study by Hamamoto Filho et al found a correlation between students' progress testing scores and their performance in a residency selection process in Brazil.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…10,[30][31][32][33]34 For example, in a study by Tomic et al,4 years of progress testing were evaluated in a medical school in Brazil and positive results were found, with a continuum of cognitive gain during medical training. 32 Similarly, previous studies with longitudinal tests on the residency program 10,29,30 found that the progress test was able to detect the difference 33,35 among residency years. Taken together, the knowledge scores increased over the years.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 76%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Longitudinal evaluation of the Ophthalmology residents in Brazil: an observational prospective study

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND: The longitudinal evaluation of students seems to be a better way to assess their knowledge compared with that of the traditional methods of evaluation, such as modular and final tests. Currently, progress testing is the most consolidated type of longitudinal testing method. However, despite being well consolidated as an assessment tool in medical education, the use of this type of test in residency programs is scarce. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate residents' knowledge growth regarding residency training and to describe the implementation of a longitudinal evaluation test in ophthalmological residency training across several medical schools in Brazil. Finally, the study aimed to check whether performance in the tests can be used as a predictor of the results of the specialist title test. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a prospective observational study. This study was conducted using an online platform. METHODS: Online tests were developed following the same pattern as the Brazilian Ophthalmology Council specialist tests. All the residents performed the test simultaneously. The tests were conducted once a year at the end of the school year. RESULTS: A progress test was conducted across 13 services with 259 residents. Our results demonstrated that resident scores improved over the years (P < 0.0001) and had a moderate correlation with the Brazilian Opthalmology Council specialist test (P = 0.0156). CONCLUSION: The progress test can be considered a valuable tool to assess knowledge, meaning their knowledge increased over residency training. In addition, it can be used as a predictor of the result in the specialist title test.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%