1980
DOI: 10.1016/0049-3848(80)90418-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostacyclin therapy in peripheral arterial disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After flushing, this is usually the most frequent adverse effect in patient studies also (Bergman et al, 1981;Dowd et al, 1982;Olsson, 1980;Pardy et al, 1980;Szczeklik, et al, 1980a;Zusman et at., 1981b). Again, the mechanism is unknown but a similar headache often develops with other vasodilators.…”
Section: Headachementioning
confidence: 99%
“…After flushing, this is usually the most frequent adverse effect in patient studies also (Bergman et al, 1981;Dowd et al, 1982;Olsson, 1980;Pardy et al, 1980;Szczeklik, et al, 1980a;Zusman et at., 1981b). Again, the mechanism is unknown but a similar headache often develops with other vasodilators.…”
Section: Headachementioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 It might be assumed that the combination of different strategies to treat PAD, such as the vasodilator action of prostacyclin combined with therapeutic angiogenesis, would be useful to stimulate collateral formation, because prostacyclins are widely used for the treatment of PAD. 23,24 An alternative idea is to achieve the optimal conditions for plasmid DNA transfer into skeletal muscle as follows: (1) increase the injection volume of plasmid DNA, (2) change the solution in which plasmid DNA is dissolved, and (3) apply hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy with plasmid DNA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up until now several clinical studies have been published on therapeutic efficacy of PGI 2 in advanced PVD although most of them were uncontrolled (Szczeklik et al 1979(Szczeklik et al , 1980Pardy et al 1980;Machin etal. 1981;Olsson and Nilsson 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%