2019
DOI: 10.1096/fj.201901611r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostaglandin E2sequentially activates E‐prostanoid receptor‐3 and thromboxane prostanoid receptor to evoke contraction and increase in resistance of the mouse renal vasculature

Abstract: Although recognized to have an in vivo vasodepressor effect blunted by the vasoconstrictor effect of E-prostanoid receptor-3 (EP3), prostaglandin E 2 (PGE 2 ) evokes contractions of many vascular beds that are sensitive to antagonizing the thromboxane prostanoid receptor (TP). This study aimed to determine the direct effect of PGE 2 on renal arteries and/or the whole renal vasculature and how each of these two receptors is involved in the responses. Experiments were performed on isolated vessels and perfused k… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In WT vessels, the EP3 antagonist L798106 but not the EP1 antagonist SC19220 (either of them has a non-selective effect on TP) added to the effect of TP antagonism, 15,17,34 which rules out an involvement of EP1 and suggests that the activation of EP3 is a natural property of PGI 2 as we revealed with other PGs previously. 15,29,30 Moreover, the results of PGI 2 or its analogue and IP agonist iloprost obtained with perfused kidneys together with findings in renal arteries suggest that PGI 2 can cause an overall direct vasoconstrictor effect on the mouse renal vasculature and the dilator activity outweighed by activities of TP and EP3 results from IP as in some other vascular beds. 15,17,19 Also worthy of mention is that while PGI 2 evoked contraction from ~0.001-0.01 µM in PE-precontracted WT renal arteries, it caused relaxation at 0.01-1 µM in EP3 −/− counterparts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In WT vessels, the EP3 antagonist L798106 but not the EP1 antagonist SC19220 (either of them has a non-selective effect on TP) added to the effect of TP antagonism, 15,17,34 which rules out an involvement of EP1 and suggests that the activation of EP3 is a natural property of PGI 2 as we revealed with other PGs previously. 15,29,30 Moreover, the results of PGI 2 or its analogue and IP agonist iloprost obtained with perfused kidneys together with findings in renal arteries suggest that PGI 2 can cause an overall direct vasoconstrictor effect on the mouse renal vasculature and the dilator activity outweighed by activities of TP and EP3 results from IP as in some other vascular beds. 15,17,19 Also worthy of mention is that while PGI 2 evoked contraction from ~0.001-0.01 µM in PE-precontracted WT renal arteries, it caused relaxation at 0.01-1 µM in EP3 −/− counterparts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The responses of mouse mesenteric arteries where EP3 has limited expression were also determined. 29,30 As shown in Figure 4B, in NOS-inhibited, PE (1 µM) precontracted WT mouse mesenteric arteries, PGI 2 (0.01-10 µM) evoked relaxation that was blunted at ≥0.1 µM. Interestingly, such relaxation to PGI 2 was increased in TP −/− /EP3 −/− vessels but unaltered in those of EP3 −/− mice ( Figure 4B).…”
Section: Effects Of Tp −/− And/or Ep3 −/− On Pgi 2 Response In Mousmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations