2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.06.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostate intrafraction motion during the preparation and delivery of MR-guided radiotherapy sessions on a 1.5T MR-Linac

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
87
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
87
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, margins were never exceeded in the left-right axis. Intrafraction motion amplitude was highest in the antero-posterior axis and lowest in the left-right axis, in accordance with the motions that could be expected from rectum and bladder filling and with previous findings [8,11,[23][24][25]. The Calypso Ò data showed that the median offset of prostate during SBRT was close to 0, with a maximum of 2.3 mm (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In contrast, margins were never exceeded in the left-right axis. Intrafraction motion amplitude was highest in the antero-posterior axis and lowest in the left-right axis, in accordance with the motions that could be expected from rectum and bladder filling and with previous findings [8,11,[23][24][25]. The Calypso Ò data showed that the median offset of prostate during SBRT was close to 0, with a maximum of 2.3 mm (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Also, we believe that the full potential of MR-Linac systems lies in achieving these very small PTV margins that are not possible with conventional systems. Based on our prostate motion analyses, 3 to 4 mm margins are sufficient for current prostate cancer treatment without intra-fraction adaptation [12] . Enlarging the PTV margin in our study to i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Prior investigations by our department showed that the geometrical accuracy of the Elekta MR-Linac system is on average 0.3 mm (range 0.2–0.4 mm) [6] . Concerning prostate motion, we have developed an accurate soft tissue prostate tracking algorithm with a mean error of 0.07 mm (SD 0.22 mm) [11] , [12] . Combined with new treatment planning systems developed at our department that facilitate online (intrafraction) replanning to account for anatomy shifts and changes, we assumed that a 1 mm PTV margin is achievable [9] , [13] , [14] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scenario, the use of rectal spacers for mitigating prostate motion represents a helpful tool to maximize the safety and accuracy of extremely hypofractionated treatments for prostate cancer [41,42]. To date, the use of this device has been safely reported by Alongi et al in a series of 20 patients who received MR-guided prostate SBRT using rectal hydrogel spacer.…”
Section: Mr-guided Radiotherapy: Present Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%