Protecting the state: Russian repressive tactics in the North Caucasus

Abstract

Since the end of the second Chechen campaign, the North Caucasus counterinsurgency has experienced the shift from military involvement toward prevalence of law enforcement instruments. This paper discusses the composition of repressive tactics that the Russian state developed as a result of the two decades long evolution of a counter strategy designed to eliminate illegal armed groups operating in the North Caucasus. It is focused on the late stages of conflict (2007-2014) when the violence that had spread across the region started in the early 2000s had symbolically culminated in 2007 with the proclamation of the Caucasian Emirate. This paper advances a reconceptualization of the Russian counterinsurgency by devising an analysis of indiscriminate and discriminate repressive tactics. It demonstrates that security agencies incorporated more selective uses of violence into their tactics, thereby reducing the number of indiscriminate violent actions to an insignificant level. Moreover, along with selective violence, security institutions reinforced their effort by conducting preventive work such as the detection of secret caches of weapons, seizures, and arrests. Findings regarding the current composition of repressive tactics are illustrated by means of new disaggregated media-based data that were especially collected and analyzed to form the basis of this research.

La propaganda como termómetro de la lucha armada: el caso del Emirato del Cáucaso (2010-2019)

“…8 Aunque algunos 5 Más tarde, y a propósito de la celebración de los Juegos Olímpicos de invierno en Sochi (2014), el Kremlin diseñó un nuevo plan de seguridad para la región, que logró diezmar todavía más a las guerrillas (Zhemukhov y Orttung 2014). Aunque esas operaciones militares han sido decisivas, también lo ha sido la nueva apuesta de Moscú por persuadir a la población local a través de tácticas de prevención del extremismo violento (PEV), como arrestos entre su red de apoyo civil (Holland, Witmer y O'Loughlin 2017) e incautaciones de escondites de armas (Zhirukhina 2018). En cambio, Sokirianskaia (2019), aunque valora este cambio estratégico, considera que no todas las operaciones rusas de PEV han sido ejecutadas quirúrgicamente y, de hecho, pueden llegar a ser contraproducentes.…”

Enhancing the Robustness of Causal Claims Based on Case Study Research on Conflict Zones: Observations from Fieldwork in Donbas

“…Case studies are a common method of social science work, but in contrast to many other subdisciplines, the specific context of research on conflict zones is significantly more challenging. 1 This applies to many different geographic regions, and it is also clearly evident in the post-Soviet space, where researchers grapple with various risks and uncertainties-from the protracted conflicts in the region's de-facto states to the Central Asian borderlands with Afghanistan and China (Menon 2003;Weitz 2004), and to the volatile republics of the Russian North Caucasus (Souleimanov 2015;Ware et al 2002;Zhirukhina 2018). Given the relevance of the post-Soviet space to some of the most pressing national and international security challenges today, 2 well-conducted case studies in this field can, and should, go beyond Theda Skocpol's (2003) "doubly engaged social science," namely not only "to understand real-world transformations" and to contribute to "scholarly debates about causal hypotheses, theoretical frameworks, and optimal methods of empirical investigation," but also to use the enhanced knowledge and understanding thus gained to offer insights into how these real-world transformations can be managed more effectively for better outcomes (409).…”