SAE Technical Paper Series 2011
DOI: 10.4271/2011-26-0099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protection Devices to Improve Frontal Pendulum Impact Performance of Heavy Commercial Vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The foam material is BateFoam 87100/87124 (Dwivedi et al, 2011). The The second part needs to be improved is the rear wall horizontal beam which has the 307.3 mm maximum dynamic deformation in X direction and was crushed, as shown in Figure 17, but at the same time the longitudinal beam is not crushed, implying that the stiffness allocation of the two beams is mismatched.…”
Section: Improvement Of Cab Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The foam material is BateFoam 87100/87124 (Dwivedi et al, 2011). The The second part needs to be improved is the rear wall horizontal beam which has the 307.3 mm maximum dynamic deformation in X direction and was crushed, as shown in Figure 17, but at the same time the longitudinal beam is not crushed, implying that the stiffness allocation of the two beams is mismatched.…”
Section: Improvement Of Cab Structurementioning
confidence: 99%