2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25312-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protective humoral and cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 persist up to 1 year after recovery

Abstract: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination has been launched worldwide to build effective population-level immunity to curb the spread of this virus. The effectiveness and duration of protective immunity is a critical factor for public health. Here, we report the kinetics of the SARS-CoV-2 specific immune response in 204 individuals up to 1-year after recovery from COVID-19. RBD-IgG and full-length spike-IgG concentrations and serum neutralizing capacity decreases during the first 6-months, but is maintained stably up to 1-year a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
87
2
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
8
87
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…All participants who were identified as seropositive 2 months after the outbreak (n = 34) maintained the seropositivity for 6 months after the confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. This result is in agreement with many other studies demonstrating the persistence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies for at least 6 months after infection [9,12,13,15,16,21,27]. More than one third of seropositive individuals had virus-specific IgM along with IgG, which indicates that IgM may persist for 6 months, thus providing additional confirmation that IgM is not a suitable marker for identifying early infection due to expected high falsepositivity for previously infected individuals [9,11,18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…All participants who were identified as seropositive 2 months after the outbreak (n = 34) maintained the seropositivity for 6 months after the confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. This result is in agreement with many other studies demonstrating the persistence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies for at least 6 months after infection [9,12,13,15,16,21,27]. More than one third of seropositive individuals had virus-specific IgM along with IgG, which indicates that IgM may persist for 6 months, thus providing additional confirmation that IgM is not a suitable marker for identifying early infection due to expected high falsepositivity for previously infected individuals [9,11,18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Excluding the known reinfection case, the seropositivity rate after 13 months was high with antibodies present in 38 out of 46 participants suggesting that detectable levels of virus-specific antibodies persist in a majority of the cases. The comparison of ELISA results 6 months and 13 months after the outbreak revealed sustained IgG levels in 14 participants and a decline of IgG levels in 17 participants, which is in agreement with other studies indicating a gradual decline of circulating antibodies after infection [12,16,17,24,33,34]. Interestingly, the levels of virus-specific IgG increased in 7 participants without any documented reinfection using periodically performed RT-PCR tests or self-reported symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, the durability of immunity to SARS-CoV-2 remains unclear since there is a decline in circulating antibody titres a few months after recovery or vaccination [148][149][150]. In turn, some authors have found sustained T-cell immunity despite a decline in the antibody response months after infection [151,152], suggesting that other immune components contribute to protective immunity.…”
Section: Immune Correlates Of Protection From Sars-cov-2 Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%