2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10654-022-00888-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteomics and Population Biology in the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS): design of a study with mentored access and active data sharing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Briefly, slow off‐rate modified aptamers (SOMA) were used to target proteins and evaluated relative concentrations of multiple proteins on a single assay and SOMAscan was preferred due to a larger panel size over other platforms at the time of the study. The clinical and analytic validity of the aptamer‐based assay method has been demonstrated in recent reports (Ngo et al, 2016 ) and the high correlation between SOMAscan levels and conventional ELISA‐based measures suggests the platform is comparable to other available methods and particularly well suited for plasma biomarker discovery (Austin et al, 2022 ; Fitzgibbons et al, 2017 ). The SOMAscan technology was used to run the assays in 2020 for CHS (Version 4.0) and in 2011 for FOS (Version 1.1 and 1.3) and, according to the fee for service agreement, provided measures of 1305 plasma proteins in CHS from samples drawn in 1992–1993 (the third examination for the original cohort and first for the African American cohort) and 1373 proteins in FOS from samples drawn in 1991–1995 (the fifth examination).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Briefly, slow off‐rate modified aptamers (SOMA) were used to target proteins and evaluated relative concentrations of multiple proteins on a single assay and SOMAscan was preferred due to a larger panel size over other platforms at the time of the study. The clinical and analytic validity of the aptamer‐based assay method has been demonstrated in recent reports (Ngo et al, 2016 ) and the high correlation between SOMAscan levels and conventional ELISA‐based measures suggests the platform is comparable to other available methods and particularly well suited for plasma biomarker discovery (Austin et al, 2022 ; Fitzgibbons et al, 2017 ). The SOMAscan technology was used to run the assays in 2020 for CHS (Version 4.0) and in 2011 for FOS (Version 1.1 and 1.3) and, according to the fee for service agreement, provided measures of 1305 plasma proteins in CHS from samples drawn in 1992–1993 (the third examination for the original cohort and first for the African American cohort) and 1373 proteins in FOS from samples drawn in 1991–1995 (the fifth examination).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The median intra‐assay (inter‐assay) coefficient of variation was 3.4% (4.4%) for CHS proteins using quality control samples and <8.2% (7.8%) for FOS proteins using pooled plasma samples. Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.66 in 100 samples from two examination cycles for CHS and >0.95 for FOS‐blinded duplicate samples (Austin et al, 2022 ; Ngo et al, 2016 ). The values of protein levels were log 2 ‐transformed and standardized (mean = 0, SD = 1) in CHS and were log e ‐transformed and standardized in FOS for this analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EDTA plasma samples were processed in a standardized fashion, shipped on dry ice to the CHS Core Laboratory, and, after initial storage in −70°C freezers, they have been stored at −80° for the past 20 years. 13 All participants with previously unthawed plasma samples available from the 1992–1993 clinic visit (N = 3,188) underwent plasma proteomics, as part of the CHS Proteomics Ancillary Study, and samples for 3,185 participants passed quality control criteria. 13 The Institutional Review Boards at the University of Washington and each study site approved the study, and all CHS participants provided written informed consent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 All participants with previously unthawed plasma samples available from the 1992–1993 clinic visit (N = 3,188) underwent plasma proteomics, as part of the CHS Proteomics Ancillary Study, and samples for 3,185 participants passed quality control criteria. 13 The Institutional Review Boards at the University of Washington and each study site approved the study, and all CHS participants provided written informed consent. Data that are reported in this study are available on reasonable request through the CHS Coordinating Center (CHS-NHLBI.org).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation