2022
DOI: 10.21320/2500-2139-2022-15-2-119-129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protocol ALL-IC BFM 2002: Outcomes of Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treatment under Multi-Center Clinical Trial

Abstract: Background. Programs of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment, developed by the BFM (Berlin-Frankfurt -Munster) Group in 2002, remain one the most effective in the world. Long-term (10-15 years) overall survival in ALL children is above 90 %. Great progress in ALL treatment provided ground for including the ALL-IC BFM 2002 protocol into the Clinical Guidelines in 2020 (ID: 529). Aim. To present the outcomes of ALL treatment in children according to ALL-IC BFM 2002 under the multi-center clinic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The peripheral blast count on the 8th day of chemotherapy was <1000/µL, and the percentage of blasts in myelogram at 15 days of treatment was <2%. Intensive chemotherapy according to the ALL-IC-BMF 2009 protocol [6] concluded in July 2016. In January 2017, a very early isolated BM relapse was diagnosed, and a subsequent genetic analysis of somatic karyotype and microarrays revealed previously non-existent karyotype changes: 46,XY,t(9;17)(p10;p10).…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peripheral blast count on the 8th day of chemotherapy was <1000/µL, and the percentage of blasts in myelogram at 15 days of treatment was <2%. Intensive chemotherapy according to the ALL-IC-BMF 2009 protocol [6] concluded in July 2016. In January 2017, a very early isolated BM relapse was diagnosed, and a subsequent genetic analysis of somatic karyotype and microarrays revealed previously non-existent karyotype changes: 46,XY,t(9;17)(p10;p10).…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%