2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.artint.2005.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protocols from perceptual observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that the system has observed a single object of class a on the table at time t 307 , and the next recorded event was at time t 309 , which was when there were two objects on the table, one of class a and the other of class b respectively. The vision system is described in more details in [12].…”
Section: The Vision Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This indicates that the system has observed a single object of class a on the table at time t 307 , and the next recorded event was at time t 309 , which was when there were two objects on the table, one of class a and the other of class b respectively. The vision system is described in more details in [12].…”
Section: The Vision Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of the experimentation and the reporting of it here is primarily to compare and contrast descriptive and predictive approaches to learning rules from vision data. More specifically, the contribution of this paper is a comparison between Progol and HR on the task of learning protocols from visual observations reported in [12] whereas, in this earlier work, only Progol was employed. While qualitative comparisons of these systems are given in [1] and [2], this is the first quantitative comparison between them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations