2001
DOI: 10.1063/1.1357783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proton transport polarization and depolarization of hydroxyapatite ceramics

Abstract: Polarization of sintered hydroxyapatite (HAp) ceramics by application of an external dc field at higher temperature was analyzed by thermally stimulated depolarization current (TSDC) measurements. The mechanisms for the polarization and depolarization of HAp were discussed in relation to the instability of the protons in the hydroxide groups. The TSDC spectra consisted of broad peaks, while the ferroelectric substances such as the BaTiO3 ceramics exhibited a sharp peak. Although the maximum current density of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
303
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(320 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
16
303
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note, that similar polarization (in absolute values) was estimated on the order of ~ 0.005 C/m 2 for various type of HAP NPs [30] (see Table 3), the other measured data 0.072 C/m 2 is close to the value for HAP crystal structure ~ 0.1 C/m 2 estimated in works [13-15, 28, 29], and computed for minimal sized HAP cluster (see Table 4) [30]. These data are comparable with the biggest known measured value 0.149 C/m 2 by Nakamura [12], and it is only twice lower in average. Here we should make some remarks on the results, which were obtained in work [61].…”
Section: Main Principles and Features Of Hap Surfaces Charges And Elsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Note, that similar polarization (in absolute values) was estimated on the order of ~ 0.005 C/m 2 for various type of HAP NPs [30] (see Table 3), the other measured data 0.072 C/m 2 is close to the value for HAP crystal structure ~ 0.1 C/m 2 estimated in works [13-15, 28, 29], and computed for minimal sized HAP cluster (see Table 4) [30]. These data are comparable with the biggest known measured value 0.149 C/m 2 by Nakamura [12], and it is only twice lower in average. Here we should make some remarks on the results, which were obtained in work [61].…”
Section: Main Principles and Features Of Hap Surfaces Charges And Elsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Here we should make some remarks on the results, which were obtained in work [61]. There a very small surface charge (0.000033 C/m 2 ) was registered under the following poling conditions: Ep = 400 V/mm ~ 400 kV/m, Tp = 350 C, and tp = 60 min, which is two orders lower than the above values [30,43,60] and almost four orders of magnitude smaller than the values of 0.1-0.149 C/m 2 , (under similar poling condition Ep = 100 kV/m, Tp = 400 °C, tp ~ 1 hour) [12]. The latter result was obtained by thermally stimulated depolarization current (TSDC) measurements, and is comparable with other above estimations [13][14][15][28][29][30].…”
Section: Main Principles and Features Of Hap Surfaces Charges And Elmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, polarization of HAP-HYA composite is predominated by HAP, as in the case of the composite system with GLT [7]. Polarization mechanism of HAP in the case of poling the sintered HAP is known to be the self-organization of the polaron H C -O 2K as a consequence of the successive proton migration into the proton vacancy around O 2K [9]. The possibility that the polarization of OH K parallel to the c-axis is promoted was suggested in the HAP-GLT composite [7].…”
Section: Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%