Provision of information regarding electronic cigarettes from shop employees in New York City

Basch, Corey H.; Kecojevic, Aleksandar; Menafro, Anthony

doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2016.03.034

Cited by 9 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…192–194,214,288,325–327,332,335,336,338,353,354,361,369,372,374,382,384,389,390,446,448,449,453–457,461–464,467,471–474,476,477,484,485,488,490,492,493,495,502,503 In the U.S. and Great Britain, this belief has eroded over time with more individuals mistakenly believing ENDS are as harmful or more harmful that cigarettes. 391,414 Studies suggest that ENDS are also perceived as less addictive than cigarettes, 367,375,403,446 tools that may help users reduce or quit smoking, 320,327,330,338,357,374,448,453,455,458,461,464,467,481,483,485,486,488,493,495,499 less expensive than cigarettes, 335,338,447,455,456,472,499 and more convenient or easier to use than cigarettes.…”

Section: Evidence Synthesismentioning

confidence: 99%

Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review

Glasser

Collins

Pearson

et al. 2017

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

420

332

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Context Rapid developments in e-cigarettes, or electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), and the evolution of the overall tobacco product marketplace warrant frequent evaluation of the published literature. The purpose of this article is to report updated findings from a comprehensive review of the published scientific literature on ENDS. Evidence acquisition The authors conducted a systematic review of published empirical research literature on ENDS through May 31, 2016, using a detailed search strategy in the PubMed electronic database, expert review, and additional targeted searches. Included studies presented empirical findings and were coded to at least one of nine topics: (1) Product Features; (2) Health Effects; (3) Consumer Perceptions; (4) Patterns of Use; (5) Potential to Induce Dependence; (6) Smoking Cessation; (7) Marketing and Communication; (8) Sales; and (9) Policies; reviews and commentaries were excluded. Data from included studies were extracted by multiple coders (October 2015 to August 2016) into a standardized form and synthesized qualitatively by topic. Evidence synthesis There were 686 articles included in this systematic review. The majority of studies assessed patterns of ENDS use and consumer perceptions of ENDS, followed by studies examining health effects of vaping and product features. Conclusions Studies indicate that ENDS are increasing in use, particularly among current smokers, pose substantially less harm to smokers than cigarettes, are being used to reduce/quit smoking, and are widely available. More longitudinal studies and controlled trials are needed to evaluate the impact of ENDS on population-level tobacco use and determine the health effects of longer-term vaping.

show abstract

Section: Evidence Synthesismentioning

confidence: 99%

Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review

Glasser

Collins

Pearson

et al. 2017

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

420

332

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…US studies have questioned whether ENDS retail staff, including specialist vape shop staff, have the expertise or objectivity to offer reliable ENDS advice. 35–37 Our participants reported positive interactions with specialist vape shop retailers, whose practical guidance assisted vaping uptake. However, positive interactions do not necessarily mean the retailers provided evidence-based cessation counselling, or that the information provided promoted public health goals.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 83%

A qualitative exploration of information-seeking by electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) users in New Zealand

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesGiven recent increases in awareness and uptake of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), we aimed to explore ENDS users’ information needs and search behaviours and whether information gaps exist.DesignQualitative study using semistructured interviews that probed participants’ smoking behaviours and ENDS use; data in this study examine ENDS information-seeking behaviours. We used qualitative description to analyse interview transcripts.Participants and settingWe recruited 39 current ENDS users (20 dual users and 19 exclusive ENDS users who reported having previously smoked cigarettes regularly) aged 18 and over, from three urban centres in New Zealand.ResultsSeveral participants used Google to search for information on ENDS’ health effects, but described the material they retrieved as vague or contradictory. Some interpreted the absence of information on long-term health effects as evidence ENDS did not pose potential health risks, and several perceived e-liquids as benign. Many relied on information sourced from other ENDS users, gleaned from online forums, YouTube or from discussions with friends and acquaintances; these sources typically presented ENDS positively. Several participants found specialist ENDS retailers provided valuable advice; non-specialist store staff generally lacked detailed product knowledge and sometimes offered inaccurate information.ConclusionPeople seeking information on ENDS’ health effects are more likely to retrieve recommendations, product reviews and endorsements from online sources or through exchanges with other users, than they are to find scientific data. Health authorities could help meet potential users’ information needs by, first, creating and frequently updating objective lay summaries of the latest scientific evidence; second, by mandating licensing for retailers with guidelines to disclose uncertainty over ENDS’ efficacy for cessation and longer-term health effects, and the need for complete substitution of ENDS for combustible cigarettes among those who use these products.

show abstract

“…Vape shop owners appear to be providing health information and advice about quitting smoking to their customers in more in-depth ways than one would encounter at a grocery store, corner store, or convenience store [3]. The information provided by vape shop owners and clerks may not match scientific evidence [25,26,27], and marketing strategies appear to parallel marketing practices used by traditional tobacco retailers [28]. …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identification of Vape Shops in Two North Carolina Counties: An Approach for States without Retailer Licensing

Lee

D’Angelo

Kuteh

et al. 2016

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Stores that sell electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) as their primary product are a new phenomenon and often termed “vape shops”. While vape shops are now regulated by state and federal agencies, not all states maintain lists of vape shops in operation. Standard ways of identifying tobacco retailers through off-premise alcohol permits and business listing services may not identify vape shops. We used four online business listing services (i.e., Google Maps, ReferenceUSA, YellowPages.com, Yelp) to identify vape shops in two counties in North Carolina (NC). In one county, we also assessed four vaping web sites. We drove primary and secondary roads to physically validate the identified stores and attempt to identify stores not listed online. To assess the accuracy of the online searches, we calculated sensitivity and positive predictive values (PPVs). This research was conducted in spring and summer 2016 and identified 28 vape shops online. We confirmed 16 vape shops (seven in Pitt County, NC, USA, and nine in Durham County, NC, USA). Online searches ranged in sensitivity, 62.5%–81.3%, and PPVs ranged from 73.3% to 92.3%. Because of the range of sensitivity found among the business listing services, state policymakers should consider uniform licensing requirements for vape and tobacco retailers to more easily track retailers and ensure compliance with regulations.

show abstract

Provision of information regarding electronic cigarettes from shop employees in New York City

Cited by 9 publications

References 6 publications

Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review

Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review

A qualitative exploration of information-seeking by electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) users in New Zealand

Identification of Vape Shops in Two North Carolina Counties: An Approach for States without Retailer Licensing

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About