2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.otorri.2012.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pruebas de despistaje auditivo en adultos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, being male, older ages, and long commuting times were associated with a statistically significant shift in hearing thresholds in a sample of healthy Mexican adults. Although hearing thresholds in this population did not meet the criteria to be considered as hearing loss and were within normal limits, even at older ages 13 , the audiometric pattern resembles that of noise-induced hearing loss, characterized by a drop in hearing thresholds at 4000 and 6000 Hz and a recovery at 8000 Hz, which has been identified to a larger extent in populations exposed to industrial noise 14,15 . In addition, the audiometric curve in subjects aged 45 years or older did not show any presbycusis pattern, as it would be expected in older adult populations, which suggests a possible role of noise in our findings (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In the present study, being male, older ages, and long commuting times were associated with a statistically significant shift in hearing thresholds in a sample of healthy Mexican adults. Although hearing thresholds in this population did not meet the criteria to be considered as hearing loss and were within normal limits, even at older ages 13 , the audiometric pattern resembles that of noise-induced hearing loss, characterized by a drop in hearing thresholds at 4000 and 6000 Hz and a recovery at 8000 Hz, which has been identified to a larger extent in populations exposed to industrial noise 14,15 . In addition, the audiometric curve in subjects aged 45 years or older did not show any presbycusis pattern, as it would be expected in older adult populations, which suggests a possible role of noise in our findings (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Aun cuando los umbrales auditivos en esta población no cumplieron con los criterios para ser considerados como pérdida auditiva y se encontraron dentro de los límites normales incluso para edades mayores, 13 el patrón auditivo se asemeja al de la pérdida auditiva inducida por ruido, caracterizada por la caída de los umbrales auditivos en 4000 y 6000 Hz y con recuperación en 8000 Hz, que se ha identificado en mayor medida en población expuesta a ruido industrial. 14,15 Además, la curva audiométrica en sujetos de 45 años o más no mostró ningún patrón de presbiacusia, como se esperaría en la población adulta mayor, lo que sugiere un posible papel del ruido en nuestros hallazgos (Figuras 1 a 3). Por último, las mujeres presentaron mejores patrones auditivos que los hombres, como se ha reportado anteriormente.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…16 The questionnaire has an internal consistency of 0.956 and a sensitivity and specificity of 80 and 58%, respectively. 17 Response…”
Section: Hearing Loss Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%