2017
DOI: 10.14527/9786053188186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psikolojide ölçme ve ölçek geliştirme-II ölçme araçlarının psikometrik nitelikleri ve ölçme kuramları

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, in order to determine the reliability of the scale based on time, the scale was applied to 34 4th grade students at two weeks intervals and the correlation (stability coefficient) of the scores obtained after the applications was calculated. The high correlation value calculated by applying test-retest means that the measuring tool makes stable measurements (Erkuş et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, in order to determine the reliability of the scale based on time, the scale was applied to 34 4th grade students at two weeks intervals and the correlation (stability coefficient) of the scores obtained after the applications was calculated. The high correlation value calculated by applying test-retest means that the measuring tool makes stable measurements (Erkuş et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation values of the scores obtained in the two dimensions of the scale as a result of the applications at different times were calculated as .83 and .74, respectively. The high correlation value calculated by applying test-retest means that the measuring tool makes stable measurements (Erkuş et al, 2017). Therefore, it can be said that the scale made stable measurements.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Twenty patients who did not complete questionnaire due to time constraints at discharge were excluded, and the study was completed with 180 patients. In evaluation of scale, rule stipulating that size of sample should be at least 5 times greater than the number of variables was strictly observed [15]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cr α value of the whole scale was found to be 0.926 and 0.950. As the Cr coefficient approaches 1, it is concluded that the internal consistency of the items in the scale is high and it is desired to approach 1.00 as much as possible (Erkuş, 2017). In this respect, regarding Table 6, it can be stated that the scale and its sub-factors have very high internal consistencies.…”
Section: Findings On the Validitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The 4 th factor of the scale with 4 items 5.648 of the total variance and the 5 th factor, which consists of 5 items, accounts for 10.143 of the total variance. For an item to contribute to the relevant characteristic, the common variance is desired to be 0.50 or above (Erkuş, 2017). The total variance that the factor structure of the developed scale accounts for 65.204% and this indicates that its representative power is high.…”
Section: Findings On the Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%