2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10826-020-01752-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Evaluation of the Big Five Questionnaire for Children (BFQ-C): A Rasch Model Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Big Five and Big Three models were originally derived in adult samples, but there is now evidence for comparable models in child and adolescent samples, as well as continuity between adult personality and classic conceptualizations of child temperament (e.g., Cupani et al., 2020; Dyson et al., 2012; Goldsmith et al., 1987; Shiner & Masten, 2008). A number of studies have identified some or all of the Big Five traits in child and adolescent samples using structural analyses of items reflecting Big Five traits (e.g., Goldberg, 2001; Halverson et al., 2003; John et al., 1994; Measelle et al., 2005).…”
Section: Personality and Psychopathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Big Five and Big Three models were originally derived in adult samples, but there is now evidence for comparable models in child and adolescent samples, as well as continuity between adult personality and classic conceptualizations of child temperament (e.g., Cupani et al., 2020; Dyson et al., 2012; Goldsmith et al., 1987; Shiner & Masten, 2008). A number of studies have identified some or all of the Big Five traits in child and adolescent samples using structural analyses of items reflecting Big Five traits (e.g., Goldberg, 2001; Halverson et al., 2003; John et al., 1994; Measelle et al., 2005).…”
Section: Personality and Psychopathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter has been validated in the Netherlands (Muris, Meesters, & Diederen, 2005), Spain (Carrasco-Ortiz, Holgado-Tello, & del Barrio-Gandara, 2005;del Barrio, Carrasco, & Holgado, 2006;Soto et al, 2011), France (Olivier & Herve, 2015), and Argentina (Cupani, Morán, Ghío, Azpilicueta, & Garrido, 2020;Cupani & Ruarte, 2008), confirming the reliability and the five-factor structure of the scale. A study conducted in Spain showed a better fit with a four-factor model (Holgado-Tello, Carrasco-Ortiz, del Barrio-Gándara, & Chacón-Moscoso, 2009), although this difference may be explained by the fact that it used polychoric rather than Pearson matrices, which were used in previous studies (Holgado-Tello et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The present study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the items composing the STAI-T. For this purpose, we conducted a Rasch analysis following the technical recommendation for psychometric studies (Cupani et al, 2020). The initial analysis showed that the STAI-T anxiety-present and anxiety-absent items had inadequate fit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%