Psychomotor-stimulant sensitization

Wise, Roy A.; Leeb, Kira

doi:10.1097/00008877-199308000-00007

Cited by 84 publications

(51 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Considering that the diversity of reward mechanisms has been well recognized, it is important to note that the different methods used to assess the rewarding properties of drugs are not equivalent measures of a single construct. 59 Multiple conditioned effects can be observed independently from one another. For example, conditioned locomotor activity can be observed independently from CPP.…”

Section: Differential Roles Of Altered Da and 5-ht Systems On Locomotmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selective genetic disruption of dopaminergic, serotonergic and noradrenergic neurotransmission: insights into motor, emotional and addictive behaviour

Isingrini¹,

Perret²,

Rainer³

et al. 2016

jpn

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionMonoaminergic neurotransmitters, namely dopamine (DA), noradrenaline (NE) and serotonin (5-HT), extensively modulate cognitive, affective, neuroendocrine and motor functions in the brain. 1 The role of the monoaminergic systems in psychi atric pathology has been clearly established based on the observation that effective psychotropic drugs primarily target these systems. [2][3][4] However, the functional subdivision of the monoamine systems indicates a disparity in cerebral distribution, receptor subtypes and mechanisms of action. Unravelling the independent roles of the monoaminergic systems in patients with neuropsychiatric disorders remains a challenge that is complicated by their large anatomic, pharmacological and functional overlaps.At the molecular level, the monoaminergic systems share common properties. The intra-and extracellular concentrations of monoamines are primarily controlled by 2 types of transporters. The plasma membrane transporters (norepinephrine transporter [NET], serotonin transporter [SERT] and dopamine transporter [DAT]) play an essential role in the clearance and recycling of monoamines via uptake from the extracellular space, and the vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT) accumulates monoamines in synaptic vesicles and is essential for their release. 5 Two VMAT genes have been cloned, 6,7 and although the proteins encoded by these genes are structurally related, they fulfill distinct roles. VMAT1 is primarily expressed in the peripheral nervous system; VMAT2 is primarily expressed in the neurons of the central nervous system. 8,9 The functions of VMAT2 include storage of monoamines, protection of monoamines from cytoplasmic oxi dation and regulation of stimulated monoamine quantal release. 10 Thus, VMAT2 deficiency contributes to a decrease in the synaptic release of monoamines and an increase in the degradation of intracellular monoamines.To better understand the physiologic and behavioural roles of monoaminergic signalling, several investigators have created VMAT2-knockout (KO) mice by disrupting the gene that Background:The monoaminergic transmitters dopamine (DA), noradrenaline (NE) and serotonin (5-HT) modulate cerebral functions via their extensive effects in the brain. Investigating their roles has led to the creation of vesicular monoaminergic transporter-2 (VMAT2) knockout (KO) mice. While this mutation results in postnatal death, VMAT2-heterozygous (HET) mice are viable and show a complex behavioural phenotype. However, the simultaneous alteration of the 3 systems prevents investigations into their individual functions. Methods: To assess the specific role of NE, 5-HT and DA, we genetically disrupted their neurotransmission by creating conditional VMAT2-KO mice with targeted recombination. These specific recombinations were obtained by breeding VMAT2 lox/lox mice with DBHcre, SERTcre and DATcre mice, respectively. We conducted a complete neurochemical and behavioural characterization of VMAT2-HET animals in each system. Results: Conditional VMAT2-KO mice reveale...

show abstract

Section: Differential Roles Of Altered Da and 5-ht Systems On Locomotmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selective genetic disruption of dopaminergic, serotonergic and noradrenergic neurotransmission: insights into motor, emotional and addictive behaviour

Isingrini¹,

Perret²,

Rainer³

et al. 2016

jpn

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…One approach to investigate the mechanisms underlying behavioral sensitization involves manipulations of the mesolimbic dopamine pathway, a pathway involved in behavioral sensitization (Kalivas and Stewart, 1991;Wise and Leeb, 1993). One method that can be used to affect mesolimbic dopamine activity is through targeting neuronal systems that innervate the dopamine pathway.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Kappa-Opioid Agonist U69593 Potentiates Locomotor Sensitization to the D2/D3 Agonist Quinpirole: Pre- and Postsynaptic Mechanisms

Perreault

Graham

Bisnaire

et al. 2005

Neuropsychopharmacol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To assess whether the development and expression of behavioral sensitization to the dopamine D2/D3 agonist quinpirole (QNP) is influenced by coadministration of the kappa opioid receptor agonist U69593, rats received every 3-4 days for a total of 10 treatments an injection of U69593 (0.3 mg/kg) together with an injection of either a postsynaptic (0.5 mg/kg) or a presynaptic dose of QNP (0.05 mg/ kg); locomotor activity was measured after each treatment. Control rats were injected as appropriate with QNP, U69593, and vehicle/ saline. Following chronic treatment, dose-response profiles to QNP were obtained to assess the expression of sensitization; the effect of U69593 on locomotor activity in animals already sensitized to QNP was also assessed. Results showed that cotreatment of U69593 with a postsynaptic dose of QNP doubled the speed and magnitude of sensitization to QNP, while U69593 cotreatment with a presynaptic dose of QNP switched the effects of QNP from locomotor depression to locomotor sensitization. However, U69593 cotreatment with a presynaptic dose of QNP changed a different set of measures of sensitization than did cotreatment with a postsynaptic dose of the dopamine agonist. Together, findings suggest that sensitization to QNP is not a unitary phenomenon but has components that are relatively independent, mediated by distinct pre-and postsynaptic mechanisms and modulated by kappa receptor activity.

show abstract

“…Moreover, similarly to potent psychostimulants, the repeated administration of DEP results in an enhancement of sensitivity, a response frequently referred to as sensitization (6). Sensitization is currently being evaluated as a potential model for drug addiction and for drug-induced psychosis in humans (8,9). Numerous studies indicate that both the activating effects of many drugs of abuse, such as cocaine, amphetamine and ethanol (EtOH), and the expression of sensitization to those effects involve a direct or indirect action on the central dopaminergic (DAergic) neurons (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Combined effects of diethylpropion and alcohol on locomotor activity of mice: participation of the dopaminergic and opioid systems

1999

Braz J Med Biol Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The widespread consumption of anorectics and combined anorectic + alcohol misuse are problems in Brazil. In order to better understand the interactive effects of ethanol (EtOH) and diethylpropion (DEP) we examined the locomotion-activating effects of these drugs given alone or in combination in mice. We also determined whether this response was affected by dopamine (DA) or opioid receptor antagonists. A total of 160 male Swiss mice weighing approximately 30 g were divided into groups of 8 animals per group. The animals were treated daily for 7 consecutive days with combined EtOH + DEP (1.2 g/kg and 5.0 mg/ kg, ip), EtOH (1.2 g/kg, ip), DEP (5.0 mg/kg, ip) or the control solution coadministered with the DA antagonist haloperidol (HAL, 0.075 mg/ kg, ip), the opioid antagonist naloxone (NAL, 1.0 mg/kg, ip), or vehicle. On days 1, 7 and 10 after the injections, mice were assessed in activity cages at different times (15, 30, 45 and 60 min) for 5 min. The acute combination of EtOH plus DEP induced a significantly higher increase in locomotor activity (day 1: 369.5 ± 34.41) when compared to either drug alone (day 1: EtOH = 232.5 ± 23.79 and DEP = 276.0 ± 12.85) and to control solution (day 1: 153.12 ± 7.64). However, the repeated administration of EtOH (day 7: 314.63 ± 26.79 and day 10: 257.62 ± 29.91) or DEP (day 7: 309.5 ± 31.65 and day 10: 321.12 ± 39.24) alone or in combination (day 7: 459.75 ± 41.28 and day 10: 427.87 ± 33.0) failed to induce a progressive increase in the locomotor response. These data demonstrate greater locomotion-activating effects of the EtOH + DEP combination, probably involving DA and/or opioid receptor stimulation, since the daily pretreatment with HAL (day 1: EtOH + DEP = 395.62 ± 11.92 and EtOH + DEP + HAL = 371.5 ± 6.76; day 7: EtOH + DEP = 502.5 ± 42.27 and EtOH + DEP + HAL = 281.12 ± 16.08; day 10: EtOH + DEP = 445.75 ± 16.64 and EtOH + DEP + HAL = 376.75 ± 16.4) and NAL (day 1: EtOH + DEP = 553.62 ± 38.15 and EtOH + DEP + NAL = 445.12 ± 55.67; day 7: EtOH + DEP = 617.5 ± 38.89 and EtOH + DEP + NAL = 418.25 ± 61.18; day 10: EtOH + DEP = 541.37 ± 32.86 and EtOH + DEP + NAL = 427.12 ± 51.6) reduced the locomotor response induced by combined administration of EtOH + DEP. These findings also suggest that a major determinant of combined anorectic-alcohol misuse may be the increased stimulating effects produced by the combination.

show abstract

Psychomotor-stimulant sensitization

Cited by 84 publications

References 0 publications

Selective genetic disruption of dopaminergic, serotonergic and noradrenergic neurotransmission: insights into motor, emotional and addictive behaviour

Selective genetic disruption of dopaminergic, serotonergic and noradrenergic neurotransmission: insights into motor, emotional and addictive behaviour

Kappa-Opioid Agonist U69593 Potentiates Locomotor Sensitization to the D2/D3 Agonist Quinpirole: Pre- and Postsynaptic Mechanisms

Combined effects of diethylpropion and alcohol on locomotor activity of mice: participation of the dopaminergic and opioid systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About