Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2007
DOI: 10.1145/1240624.1240674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychophysical elements of wearability

Abstract: Wearable technology presents a wealth of new HCI issues. In particular, this paper addresses the impact of the physical interaction between the user's body and the device's physical form on the user's mental representation of self and cognitive abilities, a blend of HCI and ergonomics that is unique to wearable computing. We explore the human sensory mechanisms that facilitate perception of worn objects and the elements of sensation that influence the comfort of worn objects, and discuss the psychological elem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When sensors are embedded in garment platforms, inaccurate results of vital-sign sensing which need to be close to user's skin could be occurred [65]. Consequently, as the loose fit structure and elasticized material of garment platforms cannot sustain the enough and concrete form, in many cases, garment platforms were composed of skin-tight silhouette to maintain the proximity between user's body and sensors to minimize the external variables in the sensing [66]. However, skin-tight shapes would not be physically and socially comfortable [11].…”
Section: Platform Design Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When sensors are embedded in garment platforms, inaccurate results of vital-sign sensing which need to be close to user's skin could be occurred [65]. Consequently, as the loose fit structure and elasticized material of garment platforms cannot sustain the enough and concrete form, in many cases, garment platforms were composed of skin-tight silhouette to maintain the proximity between user's body and sensors to minimize the external variables in the sensing [66]. However, skin-tight shapes would not be physically and socially comfortable [11].…”
Section: Platform Design Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Better understanding of mid-air gestural interaction can be attained through a holistic approach to the topic. Putting aside technical challenges [13], there are many psychical [8], psychological [4] and psychophysical [6] aspects of using different approaches and sensors to achieve mid-air gestural interface. General "rule of thumb" of HCI and interaction design is that user interface and appropriate interaction model must be unobtrusive, inconspicuous and designed in such a way that imposes minimal cognitive load on the user [9], hence user interface should enable users to act and feel natural [25].…”
Section: Bimanual Mid-air Interaction Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hindrances of bimanual mid-air interaction are related to both human factors on the one side and sensor devices and model of their usage on the other. Regarding the sensor devices, in their paper about psychophysical elements of wearability, Dunne and Smith argue that "wearability can be seen as essential both to the willingness of the user to accept and use a wearable device, and to the ability of the device to actually provide a cognitive aid" [6] thus wearability "becomes an essential part of the humancomputer interface" [6]. Innately, wearable sensor devices are not natural and as such generally impose limitations on the user making the experience of the interaction less natural by limiting the range of movements or forcing the user to apply additional muscle strain.…”
Section: Bimanual Mid-air Interaction Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that comfort aspects play an important role when dealing with wearable devices [7], an interesting aspect with this device resides in the fact that it is very light. Indeed this interface weight less than 10% of a shoe weight.…”
Section: B Main Advantages Of the Proposed Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%