2020
DOI: 10.2188/jea.je20200148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Awareness, Individual Prevention Practice, and Psychological Effect at the Beginning of the COVID-19 Outbreak in China

Abstract: Background: The COVID-19 has spread to more than 200 countries and territories. But less is known about the knowledge, protection behavior and anxiety regarding the outbreak among the general population. Methods: A cross-sectional, population-based online survey was conducted in China and abroad from January 28 to February 1, 2020. Socio-demographic information was collected and knowledge scores, practice scores, anxiety scores and perceived risk were calculated. General linear model and binary logistic regres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Respondents in our survey rated their mental health as worse (41.6%) to a greater extent than they rated their physical health (12.6%), when comparing periods before and during the lockdown measures. Similar findings were also identified in other studies conducted in China and Spain [15,16]. Loneliness experienced throughout lockdown measures and anxiety about financial issues can affect mental health during the restrictive measures [1].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Respondents in our survey rated their mental health as worse (41.6%) to a greater extent than they rated their physical health (12.6%), when comparing periods before and during the lockdown measures. Similar findings were also identified in other studies conducted in China and Spain [15,16]. Loneliness experienced throughout lockdown measures and anxiety about financial issues can affect mental health during the restrictive measures [1].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Concerns about asymptomatic infection (85.01%) and employees gathering in the workplace (78.96%) were major reasons, which are consistent with the actual situation of asymptomatic infection ( 8 ). Many studies measured mental status using anxiety, depression, and insomnia scales in the early and peak of the COVID-19 outbreak and identified the psychological effects on different populations ( 14 18 ). However, our study was conducted after the peak of the outbreak when work began to resume, and the prevalence of those psychological symptoms would thus be lower wherein the value of analysis decreased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, due to economic reasons [ 20 ], patients with myocardial infarction who sought treatment at tertiary hospitals may not represent all patients with myocardial infarction. Lastly, we did not acquire education data from our respondents, which have proven that a lower education level was associated with an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection [ 25 ]. The participants’ education levels were difficult to evaluate, as their mean age was 66 years (range 57–73 years).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%