2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2322614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Distribution System Reforms and Consumption in Chhattisgarh: An Empirical Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like ours, these studies also find a positive impact of increase in PDS subsidy on calorie intake and diet quality (Kaul, 2014;Krishnamurthy et al, 2014). Kaul (2014) estimates that an increase in the value of the PDS subsidy by 1% increases caloric intake by 0.144%, while an increase of 1% in income (expenditure) is associated with an increase of 0.4% in caloric intake.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Like ours, these studies also find a positive impact of increase in PDS subsidy on calorie intake and diet quality (Kaul, 2014;Krishnamurthy et al, 2014). Kaul (2014) estimates that an increase in the value of the PDS subsidy by 1% increases caloric intake by 0.144%, while an increase of 1% in income (expenditure) is associated with an increase of 0.4% in caloric intake.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Because PDS food grains are generally viewed as inferior goods (Rao 2000;Majumder 2001), households without a BPL ration card only turn to PDS grains during times of economic distress when market prices increase. Consistent with this explanation, PDS consumption rose across the entire country following the global food price crisis and the global financial crisis (Krishnamurthy, Pathania, and Tandon 2014).…”
Section: The Public Distribution Systemmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…However, following the PDS reforms, the percentage of households consuming PDS rice in Chhattisgarh nearly doubled from 10 percent to 19 percent, and the average amount consumed increased by over 400 percent. In contrast, PDS consumption in neighboring districts was essentially unchanged on average during this period (Krishnamurthy, Pathania, and Tandon 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Difference-in-Difference (DID) approach has been a standard method in the literature to investigate the impact of PDS on nutrient intake (Kishore and Chakrabarti, 2015, Krishnamurthy et al, 2014a, Krishnamurthy et al, 2014b). It is a useful tool to establish causal effect of an intervention when there is a baseline and follow-up information in the form of repeated cross-section (Khandker et al, 2009, Imbens and Wooldridge, 2009).…”
Section: Empirical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%