Public health triangulation: approach and application to synthesizing data to understand national and local HIV epidemics

Abstract

BackgroundPublic health triangulation is a process for reviewing, synthesising and interpreting secondary data from multiple sources that bear on the same question to make public health decisions. It can be used to understand the dynamics of HIV transmission and to measure the impact of public health programs. While traditional intervention research and metaanalysis would be ideal sources of information for public health decision making, they are infrequently available, and often decisions can be based only on surveillance and survey data.MethodsThe process involves examination of a wide variety of data sources and both biological, behavioral and program data and seeks input from stakeholders to formulate meaningful public health questions. Finally and most importantly, it uses the results to inform public health decision-making. There are 12 discrete steps in the triangulation process, which included identification and assessment of key questions, identification of data sources, refining questions, gathering data and reports, assessing the quality of those data and reports, formulating hypotheses to explain trends in the data, corroborating or refining working hypotheses, drawing conclusions, communicating results and recommendations and taking public health action.ResultsTriangulation can be limited by the quality of the original data, the potentials for ecological fallacy and "data dredging" and reproducibility of results.ConclusionsNonetheless, we believe that public health triangulation allows for the interpretation of data sets that cannot be analyzed using meta-analysis and can be a helpful adjunct to surveillance, to formal public health intervention research and to monitoring and evaluation, which in turn lead to improved national strategic planning and resource allocation.

HIV among People Who Inject Drugs in the Middle East and North Africa: Systematic Review and Data Synthesis

“…Thus we could make a comprehensive assessment of the epidemic status and address potential limitations in any one line of evidence [93]. We did a rigorous appraisal of the scope and quality of the evidence within each country by assessing the amount and geographical coverage of available data, as well as the ROB and precision of individual point estimates.…”

Misclassification of Men with Reported HIV Infection in Ukraine

“…The data was compared and interpreted through the methodology known as triangulation. Triangulation is an analytical approach that compares and interprets multiple data sources to improve the understanding of a public health problem and assess the impact of population-level interventions [3].…”

Surveillance and response for high-risk populations: what can malaria elimination programmes learn from the experience of HIV?

“…New tools have been introduced to assist countries synthesize data from these multiple sources in order to prioritize populations and locations and to define surveillance and intervention strategies; these include the pre-surveillance assessment (PSA) [52], public health triangulation [53], and integrated epidemiologic profile [54]. …”