2018
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003220.pub3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
84
0
11

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
3
84
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding agrees with that of a recent Cochrane review, in which similar successful clinical outcomes at 6 and 12 months were illustrated for both materials, with a trend for better outcomes for MTA at 2 years, although the difference was not statistically significant (24). It was surprising to find that some clinicians were still using FC for pulpotomy in primary teeth because this has become a very difficult dental material to obtain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding agrees with that of a recent Cochrane review, in which similar successful clinical outcomes at 6 and 12 months were illustrated for both materials, with a trend for better outcomes for MTA at 2 years, although the difference was not statistically significant (24). It was surprising to find that some clinicians were still using FC for pulpotomy in primary teeth because this has become a very difficult dental material to obtain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This pattern of use aligns with evidence that supports the use of CHP for partial pulpotomy in permanent teeth, with a reported success rate of 93.5% over 4 years (27). There are similar reported success rates for CHP and MTA for partial pulpotomy, although the situation is less clear for complete pulpotomy because many studies do not clarify the type of Ca(OH) 2 used (24,28,29). In the present study, the preference of CHP over MTA for pulpotomy in anterior teeth and the corresponding preference for MTA for pulpotomy in posterior teeth most likely reflects concerns regarding the discolouration of treated teeth rather than concerns regarding effectiveness (23).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Im aktuell publizierten Coch-rane-Review zeigt MTA gegenüber Kalziumhydroxid nach 12 und 24 Monaten Beobachtung statistisch bessere klinisch-radiologische Ergebnisse. Allerdings ist das Evidenzniveau nach wie vor als schwach einzustufen [24]. Die Erfolgsquoten von MTA bewegen sich derzeit zwischen 94 und 100 % [23 -25].…”
Section: Ergebnisseunclassified
“…305 There are similar reported success rates for CHP and MTA for partial pulpotomies, 306,307 although the situation is less clear for complete pulpotomies as many studies do not clarify the type of CH used. 303 In the present study, the preference of CHP over MTA for pulpotomy in anterior teeth and the corresponding preference for MTA for pulpotomy in posterior teeth most likely reflect concerns regarding discolouration of treated teeth rather than concerns regarding effectiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This finding agrees with a recent Cochrane Review illustrating similar successful clinical outcomes at 6 and 12 months for both materials, with a trend for better outcomes for MTA at two years, although the difference was not statistically significant. 303 It was surprising to find that some clinicians were still using FC for pulpotomies in primary teeth, as this has become a very difficult dental material to obtain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%