Pulsed electromagnetic field during cast immobilization in postmenopausal women with Colles’ fracture

Lazović, Milica; Kocić, Miodrag; Dimitrijević, Ljiljana; Stanković, Ivona; Spalević, Marija; Ciric, Tamara

doi:10.2298/sarh1210619l

Cited by 18 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In terms of blinding, sham PEMF treatments in 15 trials were administered by a dummy stimulator without delivering any output. Seven trials did not apply subject blind [Xia et al, 1999; Qu et al, 2000; Yang and Yang, 2005, 2006; Foley et al, 2008; Lazović et al, 2012; Wang, 2016].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effectiveness of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on Bone Healing: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Peng

Xiong

et al. 2020

Bioelectromagnetics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effect of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) on bone healing is still uncertain and it has not been established as a standardized treatment. The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis is to evaluate the effect of PEMF on bone healing in patients with fracture. We searched CNKI, Wan Fang, VIP, EMbase, PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and Open Grey websites for randomized controlled trials (published before July 2019 in English or Chinese) comparing any form of PEMF to sham. Reference lists were also searched. Related data were extracted by two investigators independently. The bias risk of the articles and the evidence strength of the outcomes were evaluated. Twenty‐two studies were eligible and included in our analysis (n = 1,468 participants). The pooled results of 14 studies (n = 1,131 participants) demonstrated that healing rate in PEMF group was 79.7% (443/556), and that in the control group was 64.3% (370/575). PEMF increased healing rate (RR = 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10–1.35; I2 = 48%) by the Mantel–Haenszel analysis, relieved pain (standardized mean difference (SMD) = −0.49; 95% CI = −0.88 to −0.10; I2 = 60%) by the inverse variance analysis, and accelerated healing time (SMD = −1.01; 95% CI = −2.01 to −0.00; I2 = 90%) by the inverse variance analysis. Moderate quality evidence suggested that PEMF increased healing rate and relieved pain of fracture, and very low‐quality evidence showed that PEMF accelerated healing time. Larger and higher quality randomized controlled trials and pre‐clinical studies of optimal frequency, amplitude, and duration parameters are needed. © 2020 Bioelectromagnetics Society.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Barker et al [1984] used 0‐4 categorical pain scale. And Lazović et al [2012] used patient‐rated wrist evaluation, in which pain is 0‐40. The aggregated results of these 7 trials suggested that PEMF treatment can relieve pain (SMD = −0.49; 95% CI = −0.88 to −0.10; I 2 = 60%).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on Bone Healing: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Peng

Xiong

et al. 2020

Bioelectromagnetics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…EMFs, however, have been proposed to prevent bone loss in osteoporosis patients [Tabrah et al, , ; Garland et al, ] to treat non‐ or delayed unions or osteotomies [Bassett et al, , ; Barker et al, ; Sharrard, ; Scott and King, ; Simonis et al, ; Cheing et al, ; Faldini et al, ; Abdelrahim et al, ; Adie et al, ; Assiotis et al, ; Lazović et al, ; Shi et al, ; Refai et al, ; Hannemann et al, ; Streit et al, ], but their clinical application has been significantly hindered and delayed by our poor understanding of its underlying mechanisms and therefore by difficulties in defining consistent sets of parameters to be applied across a number of patients [Daish et al, ]. Although the literature is overall suggestive of clinical benefit, the fundamental heterogeneity in the published studies, coupled with the scarcity of high quality randomized controlled trials, has led to inconclusive evidence of their clinical effectiveness [Griffin et al, ; Hannemann et al, ; Handoll and Elliott, ; Spadaro, ].…”

Section: Therapeutic Effects Of Emfs On Bonementioning

confidence: 99%

The cellular effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on osteoblasts: A review

Galli

Pedrazzi

Guizzardi

2019

Bioelectromagnetics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) have long been known to interact with living organisms and their cells and to bear the potential for therapeutic use. Among the most extensively investigated applications, the use of Pulsed EMFs (PEMFs) has proven effective to ameliorate bone healing in several studies, although the evidence is still inconclusive. This is due in part to our still‐poor understanding of the mechanisms by which PEMFs act on cells and affect their functions and to an ongoing lack of consensus on the most effective parameters for specific clinical applications. The present review has compared in vitro studies on PEMFs on different osteoblast models, which elucidate potential mechanisms of action for PEMFs, up to the most recent insights into the role of primary cilia, and highlight the critical issues underlying at least some of the inconsistent results in the available literature. Bioelectromagnetics. 2019;9999:XX–XX. © 2019 Bioelectromagnetics Society.

show abstract

“…En cuanto al CEP, este puede favorecer el aumento de la circulación, la reducción de la inflamación y la aceleración de la recuperación de tejidos (26,28).…”

Section: Compresión Manualunclassified

Efecto de las intervenciones fisioterapéuticas en personas con fractura distal de radio

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Efecto de las intervenciones fisioterapéuticas en personas con fractura distal de radioObjetivo. Realizar una revisión sistemática de la mejor evidencia disponible para determinar el efecto de las intervenciones fisioterapéuticas sobre el dolor, el rango de movimiento, la fuerza muscular y la funcionalidad en personas con fractura distal de radio. Materiales y métodos.Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de ensayos clínicos controlados en las bases de datos ScienceDirect, PubMed, Medline y Embase.Resultados. Se encontraron 14 estudios que cumplieron los criterios de selección.Conclusión. La evidencia sugiere que intervenciones terapéuticas supervisadas que incluyan modalidades físicas y del ejercicio con una duración entre 6 y 9 semanas, con un promedio de 18 sesiones y realizadas tres veces a la semana mejoran de forma significativa las variables estudiadas en pacientes con FDR. Es necesario que futuros estudios establezcan la relación dosis-respuesta de estas intervenciones.Palabras clave: Fracturas del radio; Rehabilitación; Fisioterapia; Modalidades de fisioterapia (DeCS). Objective: To conduct a systematic review of the best available evidence to determine the effect of physiotherapeutic interventions on pain, range of motion, muscle strength and function in people with distal radius fracture. Materials and methods:A systematic search of controlled clinical trials was carried out in the ScienceDirect, PubMed, Medline, lilacs and EMBASE databases.Results: 14 studies met the selection criteria. Conclusion:Evidence suggests that supervised therapeutic interventions that include physical and exercise modalities lasting between 6 and 9 weeks, with an average of 18 sessions and three times a week, significantly improve the variables studied in patients with DRF. Future studies should establish the dose-response correlation of these interventions.Keywords: Radius fractures; Rehabilitation; Physical Therapy Modalities (MeSH).

show abstract

Pulsed electromagnetic field during cast immobilization in postmenopausal women with Colles’ fracture

Abstract: During immobilization PEMF therapy in DRF patients gave better results immediately after cast removal in terms of edema and wrist range of motion (ROM).

Cited by 18 publications

References 23 publications

Effectiveness of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on Bone Healing: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Effectiveness of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on Bone Healing: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The cellular effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on osteoblasts: A review

Efecto de las intervenciones fisioterapéuticas en personas con fractura distal de radio

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About