Purpose-oriented approach to the reader’s assessment of the quality of research papers

Popova, Natalia G.; Биричева, Екатерина Вячеславовна

doi:10.14515/monitoring.2018.4.09

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Между тем, очевидно, что качества лабости/силы в области борьбы за ресурсы и в сфере научного поиска принципиально различаются. Таким образом, вместо того, чтобы создавать условия для комфортной работы ученых, управленческий корпус в сфере науки и образования своими действиями фактически формирует среду нездоровой конкуренции, приводящей в некотором роде к негативной селекции человеческого материала [1].…”

unclassified

Publication ethics: Power and Gender

Kuleshova¹,

Publishers²

2018

World-Class Scientific Publication – 2018: Editorial Policy, Open Access, Scientific Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Научное издание международного уровня -2018: редакционная политика, открытый доступ, научные коммуникации: материалы 7-й международ. науч .-практ. конф., Москва, 24-27 апреля 2018 г. Аннотация: Когда мы говорим о нарушениях в сфере этики научных публикаций, обычно акцент делается на их характере, частотности, распространенности тех или иных практик в тех или иных научных средах. Но автор задался вопросом, на который при желании, опираясь на современные информационные технологии и базы данных, можно ответить эмпирически: кто эти люди, -те, кто демонстрирует неэтичное публикационное поведение разных типов? Настоящий текст, являющийся, по сути, фотографическим снимком действительности, может послужить отправной точкой для более глубоких исследований на тему, как связаны власть, гендер и этика в российском научном пространстве. Ключевые слова: этика научных публикаций, научные публикации, гендер, власть Для цитирования: Кулешова А. В. Этика научных публикаций: власть и гендер // Научное издание международного уровня -2018: редакционная политика, открытый доступ, научные коммуникации: материалы 7-й международ. науч.-практ. конф., Москва, 24-28 апреля 2018 г. М., 2018. С. 86-91. Abstract:When we speak about violations in the ethics of scientific publications, usually the emphasis is made on their nature, frequency, prevalence of certain practices in certain scientific environments. But we ask ourselves the question, on what at the modern level of development of information technologies and databases one can answer empirically: who are those people, who demonstrate unethical publication behavior of different types? We hope that this article, which is, in fact, a photographic snapshot of reality, can serve as a starting point for deeper reflection on how power, gender and ethics are related in the Russian science space.

show abstract

unclassified

Publication ethics: Power and Gender

Kuleshova¹,

Publishers²

2018

World-Class Scientific Publication – 2018: Editorial Policy, Open Access, Scientific Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Three Aspects of the Phenomenon of Science: In Search for Unity among Sociologists

2018

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction. In today’s globalising world, science acquires a crucial importance: integrating humanity within the framework of solving global problems, it becomes one of the leading factors in social development, facilitating work and diversifying leisure time, as well as serving as an instrument of transformations in the political sphere. Undoubtedly, the social aspects of contemporary science are capturing the attention of a huge number of researchers. However, it is not clear that all areas of the sociology of science treat the object of their study in the same way.Aim. A lack of reflection on the unity or otherwise in the understanding of the essence of science in the various fields of sociological research makes it difficult to compare different theories of the institutional, cultural, social and communicative contexts of scientific development. An urgent methodological task therefore consists in developing an understanding of the various definitions of the concept of “science” used in the framework of contemporary sociological analysis of this phenomenon.Results and scientific novelty. In this paper, two dominant sociological views on science – as an experimental-mathematical approach to cognising the world and as a system of representations in general – are compared. We conclude that while researchers studying institutional aspects of science tend to interpret it in terms of the “heritage” of post-Enlightenment European rationalism, constructionist and communicatively-oriented researchers tend to approach science as the system of knowledge and cognition that is formed in any human society, having its own specific sociocultural features in each respective case. While each of these two approaches undoubtedly has its own methodological potential, in order to provide such a diverse field of studies with a common ground, it would be necessary to balance them with a third aspect. We argue that this balancing role, since both common for all mankind and unique for every culture, could be played by Heidegger’s conceptualisation of science as “the theory of the real”.Practical significance. In order to avoid a pluralism of incompatible theories, it is important to continually pose the question “what is the object of study when conducting a sociological study of various scientific phenomena?” – as well as to understand the “limits of applicability” of the particular interpretation of science on which basis sociological analysis proceeds.

show abstract

Legal Electronic Libraries – Sources of Quality Information on the Internet

Zubets

2018

Tamb. Un. Rev. Ser. Hum.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We compare traditional and new methods of information search in computer networks. As the result we prove the necessity of considering the quality of information category in the process of information search by students of all forms of education. We give the definitions of “junk information” and information quality. It is necessary to take into account the information quality for intellectualization of information search and eventually for efficacy improvement of information search. One of the main sources of quality information on the Internet is legal electronic libraries. We consider the characteristics of network sources, which contain quality information and allow students to differ legal electronic libraries from unauthorized. As the example we consider several electronic libraries. We recommend to lecturers several tasks, which can be useful for students while learning methods of intellectual information search in electronic educational resources, these tasks are aimed to form competencies of modern educational standards. We conclude it is necessary to pay far more attention to the issue of quality information search on the Internet, than we do today.

show abstract

Purpose-oriented approach to the reader’s assessment of the quality of research papers

Cited by 5 publications

References 14 publications

Publication ethics: Power and Gender

Publication ethics: Power and Gender

Three Aspects of the Phenomenon of Science: In Search for Unity among Sociologists

Legal Electronic Libraries – Sources of Quality Information on the Internet

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About