2014
DOI: 10.1109/mprv.2014.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Push Notification Mechanisms for Pervasive Smartphone Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because this is from a small number of phones that were relatively close together, it is not clear how representative this metric is of latencies that would occur when sending many thousands of alerts across a wider geographic region. Moreover, for widespread roll-out, push notification (Warren et al, 2014) is a more appropriate and lower-latency protocol than text messaging and development of this capability is occurring in the next phase of our work. For comparison we note, that in a recent test of ShakeAlert in San Diego county using the U.S. federal Wireless Emergency Alert (WEA) system (Minson et al, 2020), median δt alert was ∼13 s. To the best of our knowledge no other smartphone EEW projects have reported alerting latency data (Finazzi, 2016(Finazzi, , 2020Finazzi & Fassò, 2017;Kong et al, 2016Kong et al, , 2018Kong et al, , 2020Kong, Patel, et al, 2019].…”
Section: Latency Budgetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because this is from a small number of phones that were relatively close together, it is not clear how representative this metric is of latencies that would occur when sending many thousands of alerts across a wider geographic region. Moreover, for widespread roll-out, push notification (Warren et al, 2014) is a more appropriate and lower-latency protocol than text messaging and development of this capability is occurring in the next phase of our work. For comparison we note, that in a recent test of ShakeAlert in San Diego county using the U.S. federal Wireless Emergency Alert (WEA) system (Minson et al, 2020), median δt alert was ∼13 s. To the best of our knowledge no other smartphone EEW projects have reported alerting latency data (Finazzi, 2016(Finazzi, , 2020Finazzi & Fassò, 2017;Kong et al, 2016Kong et al, , 2018Kong et al, , 2020Kong, Patel, et al, 2019].…”
Section: Latency Budgetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on handling method defined in the installed application, the pushed data may or may not be displayed directly on the screen as notifications [14]. One popular push services provided include the Android Cloud to Device Messaging Framework (C2DM) for Android, the Black-Berry Push Essentials and Push Plus for BlackBerry OS, the Apple Push Notification Service for iOS, and the Microsoft Push Notification Service for Windows Phone [15]. In the first two services on Android and Blackberry, pushed data generally are used for data distribution.…”
Section: A Push Notification Service(pns)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GCM server is used to develop Android applications where two major processes are involved in the development of client Android applications; these processes include [15]:…”
Section: B Gcm Servermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations