Abstract:The push-up technique and anatomical deployment with the Endurant stent-graft system are effective and safe methods for treating aneurysms with severely angulated necks.
“…Adjunctive techniques such as the push-up or reverse slider techniques have been reported in such cases with more favorable results. 18,19 Indeed, our registry showed no significant differences between the two groups in Log-rank analyses were used to compare between the Endurant and the Excluder groups. There was no significant difference in 5 year overall survival between the Endurant and the Excluder groups (69.7±3.7% vs 75.2±3.2%; p=0.926).…”
Purpose: To compare the long-term outcomes of the most widely used third-generation stent grafts, the Endurant and Excluder stent grafts, in Japanese patients using a multicenter registry. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of endovascular aneurysm repairs for abdominal aortic and iliac artery aneurysms using either the Endurant or the Excluder stent grafts from January 2012 to July 2019 at 10 Japanese hospitals was performed. Results: A total of 332 and 378 repairs using the Endurant and Excluder stent grafts, respectively, were analyzed. Although the patients’ characteristics were generally similar in the two groups, the Endurant group exhibited significantly shorter (Endurant: 31.5±18.6 mm, Excluder: 37.4±21.0 mm; p<0.001), larger (Endurant: 22.4±4.2 mm, Excluder: 21.7±3.8 mm; p=0.029), and more reversed tapered (Endurant: 12.1%, Excluder: 5.8%; p=0.003) proximal necks. The incidence of instructions for use (IFU) violations was similar between the two groups (Endurant: 59.0%, Excluder: 54.5%; p=0.223). However, the Endurant group had significantly more proximal neck-related IFU violations (54.1% and 46.3%, respectively; p=0.039), more access-related IFU violations (8.1% and 4.0%, respectively; p=0.019), and fewer bilateral hypogastric artery embolizations (5.1% and 9.3%, respectively; p=0.035) compared with the Excluder group. The incidence of intraoperative (Endurant: 3.6%, Excluder: 3.7%; p=0.950) and perioperative complications (Endurant: 3.6%, Excluder: 3.4%, p=0.899) was equivalent in the two groups. However, there was a significantly higher incidence of postoperative type II endoleaks in the Excluder group (Endurant: 28%, Excluder: 46.0%, p<0.001). Aneurysm sac regression was more frequent in the Endurant group (Endurant: 40.7%, Excluder: 31.7%, p=0.013). The Endurant group also had significantly higher rates of sac increase (Endurant: 13.0%, Excluder: 7.7%, p=0.020). Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank analyses revealed no statistical differences in late complications (p=0.868) and overall survival (p=0.926). Conclusions: There were no statistically significant differences between the Endurant and the Excluder stent grafts in terms of intraoperative, perioperative, and late complication rates; however, the anatomical characteristics of the patients were significantly different.
“…Adjunctive techniques such as the push-up or reverse slider techniques have been reported in such cases with more favorable results. 18,19 Indeed, our registry showed no significant differences between the two groups in Log-rank analyses were used to compare between the Endurant and the Excluder groups. There was no significant difference in 5 year overall survival between the Endurant and the Excluder groups (69.7±3.7% vs 75.2±3.2%; p=0.926).…”
Purpose: To compare the long-term outcomes of the most widely used third-generation stent grafts, the Endurant and Excluder stent grafts, in Japanese patients using a multicenter registry. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of endovascular aneurysm repairs for abdominal aortic and iliac artery aneurysms using either the Endurant or the Excluder stent grafts from January 2012 to July 2019 at 10 Japanese hospitals was performed. Results: A total of 332 and 378 repairs using the Endurant and Excluder stent grafts, respectively, were analyzed. Although the patients’ characteristics were generally similar in the two groups, the Endurant group exhibited significantly shorter (Endurant: 31.5±18.6 mm, Excluder: 37.4±21.0 mm; p<0.001), larger (Endurant: 22.4±4.2 mm, Excluder: 21.7±3.8 mm; p=0.029), and more reversed tapered (Endurant: 12.1%, Excluder: 5.8%; p=0.003) proximal necks. The incidence of instructions for use (IFU) violations was similar between the two groups (Endurant: 59.0%, Excluder: 54.5%; p=0.223). However, the Endurant group had significantly more proximal neck-related IFU violations (54.1% and 46.3%, respectively; p=0.039), more access-related IFU violations (8.1% and 4.0%, respectively; p=0.019), and fewer bilateral hypogastric artery embolizations (5.1% and 9.3%, respectively; p=0.035) compared with the Excluder group. The incidence of intraoperative (Endurant: 3.6%, Excluder: 3.7%; p=0.950) and perioperative complications (Endurant: 3.6%, Excluder: 3.4%, p=0.899) was equivalent in the two groups. However, there was a significantly higher incidence of postoperative type II endoleaks in the Excluder group (Endurant: 28%, Excluder: 46.0%, p<0.001). Aneurysm sac regression was more frequent in the Endurant group (Endurant: 40.7%, Excluder: 31.7%, p=0.013). The Endurant group also had significantly higher rates of sac increase (Endurant: 13.0%, Excluder: 7.7%, p=0.020). Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank analyses revealed no statistical differences in late complications (p=0.868) and overall survival (p=0.926). Conclusions: There were no statistically significant differences between the Endurant and the Excluder stent grafts in terms of intraoperative, perioperative, and late complication rates; however, the anatomical characteristics of the patients were significantly different.
“…Bare stents are considered solely for ensuring renal blood flow. In addition, the rest of the main body was implanted by using the push-up technique 8 to cover the proximal neck and aneurysm transition region from the inside and bottom of the aneurysm; in this way, the aneurysm transition zone can also be used for optimal proximal sealing (Figure 3). This technique was feasible owing to the excellent conformability of the Endurant aortic stent-graft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(E, F) The endograft was fitted to the shape of the aneurysm transition zone with good conformability using the push-up technique. 8 The aneurysm transition zone was also used for proximal sealing. (G) After the endograft was implanted, a bare stent was deployed into the left renal artery to maintain blood flow.…”
Purpose: To evaluate the advantages of chimney endovascular aneurysm repair (chEVAR) using an Endurant stent-graft with uncovered balloon-expandable stents (BES) for patients with juxtarenal aortic aneurysms. Materials and Methods: Twenty-two patients (mean age 78.5±9.0 years; 13 men) who underwent chEVAR using Endurant and uncovered BES between January 2014 and December 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. The maximum aneurysm diameter was 59.1±11.9 mm, and the proximal neck length was 5.2±2.9 mm. Of the 22 cases, 9 (40%) involved proximal neck angulation and 9 (40%) had a conical neck. Single and double chimneys were performed using BES in 19 and 3 cases, respectively. In 2 cases, an additional self-expanding covered stent was used inside the uncovered BES. Results: The technical success was 91% (20/22) as 2 (9%) cases showed minor type Ia endoleak. No postoperative systemic complications or acute renal dysfunction (Acute Kidney Injury Network classification stage 2 or higher) were observed. The mean radiologic observation period was 16.1±9.6 months, and no aneurysm expansion (>5 mm) was observed during this time. The mean maximum aneurysm diameter decreased to 52.9±10.2 mm (p<0.001 vs preoperative), with an individual mean sac regression of 6.2±5.9 mm. Overall primary chimney stent patency was 100%. One of the 2 cases of intraoperative type Ia endoleak resolved at the 6-month imaging, and no new type Ia endoleaks developed in any cases at follow-up. No additional treatment- or aneurysm-related events were observed. Conclusion: Short-term outcomes of chEVAR using Endurant with uncovered BES have been favorable when covered stents were unavailable, and it can be useful for high-risk patients with juxtarenal aortic aneurysms.
“…Furthermore, the third stent has not fully deployed yet. It means that the rest of the stents until the fifth stent can be deployed slowly with the push-up technique 5 (case 2; Fig 4; Video). It helps the deployment of the main body with conformability in high angulation.Fig 2Deployment of the Endurant stent graft with the reverse slider technique in the angulated neck case (case 1).…”
This report introduces the reverse slider technique to obtain proximal sealing effectively in endovascular aneurysm repair in short or angulated necks. It is the deployment process of the stent graft main body by repeatedly rotating and reversing the external slider with slight loosening of the suprarenal stent. This method helps obtain accurate placement of the proximal edge and effective sealing on the greater curvature side even in short and angulated necks. It is an effective method of extending the proximal sealing zone. It is gained by changing the deployment process with the Endurant stent graft (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, Calif) as an existing popular device.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
