2015
DOI: 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2015.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QM and QM/MM Methods Compared

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although DFT‐based methods generally represent the best trade‐off between reliability and computational cost for describing metals, [112] their accuracy may be limited for metals with both high‐ and low‐spin states, [113–114] although such systems are uncommon in the pathways of most metalloproteins [113] . Some metalloproteins have also been found to be particularly sensitive to the embedding scheme (the QM and MM connection region), [115] and QM/MM calculations often cannot cover the long timescales required for optimization of the metal coordination spheres [112,116] …”
Section: Methods In Computational Enzyme Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although DFT‐based methods generally represent the best trade‐off between reliability and computational cost for describing metals, [112] their accuracy may be limited for metals with both high‐ and low‐spin states, [113–114] although such systems are uncommon in the pathways of most metalloproteins [113] . Some metalloproteins have also been found to be particularly sensitive to the embedding scheme (the QM and MM connection region), [115] and QM/MM calculations often cannot cover the long timescales required for optimization of the metal coordination spheres [112,116] …”
Section: Methods In Computational Enzyme Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But compared to molecular dynamics simulations, only part of the protein can be simulated efficiently and thus this general approach is applied here to only simulate around the first coordination shell around the metal coordination center [31]. The QM approach undertaken here is beneficial for the close examination of the local coordination chemistry, however, it largely misses the other protein-protein interactions important for ligand selectivity as well as complex stability, thus the scope of this work is limited to the events around the coordination center, and a more sophisticated approach using the QM/ MM methods has to be utilized to understand the behavior of the MMPs systematically [32].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%