2008 4th International Conference on Next Generation Web Services Practices 2008
DOI: 10.1109/nwesp.2008.41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QoS Based Ranking for Web Services: Fuzzy Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The output of the ranking process is an ordered list of running service instances corresponding both to the extended keywords and to the requirements in terms of context expressed by the developer. The pattern-based design of the component makes it possible to extend the strategies to accommodate emerging research, e.g., [33], [34], [35] on matching and ranking that needs, however, to be adapted to consider the specifics of real-world services.…”
Section: Service Instance Rankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output of the ranking process is an ordered list of running service instances corresponding both to the extended keywords and to the requirements in terms of context expressed by the developer. The pattern-based design of the component makes it possible to extend the strategies to accommodate emerging research, e.g., [33], [34], [35] on matching and ranking that needs, however, to be adapted to consider the specifics of real-world services.…”
Section: Service Instance Rankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuzzy logic is a solution for both the computational complexity and the matching with imprecise QoS constraints. An overview of fuzzy approaches is presented in [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major limitation of these methods, however, is that they may not be able to differentiate between qualitative and non-qualitative services. Various solutions have been proposed by the service research community, such as the use of Quality of Service (QoS) information [43,42,3], user generated data (such as user ratings or feedback) [24,41,25,7], or multiple ranking criteria for decision making [38].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%