QT and Tpeak‐Tend interval variability: Predictive electrical markers of hospital stay length and mortality in acute decompensated heart failure. Preliminary data

Abstract

Background As previously reported, an increased repolarization temporal imbalance induces a higher risk of total/cardiovascular mortality. Hypothesis The aim of this study was to assess if the electrocardiographic short period markers of repolarization temporal dispersion could be predictive of the hospital stay length and mortality in patients with acutely decompensated chronic heart failure (CHF). Method Mean, standard deviation (SD), and normalized variance (VN) of QT (QT) and Tpeak‐Tend (Te) were obtained on 5‐min ECG recording in 139 patients hospitalized for acutely decompensated CHF, subgrouping the patients for hospital length of stay (LoS): less or equal 1 week (≤1 W) and those with more than 1 week (>1 W). Results We observed an increase of short‐period repolarization variables (TeSD and TeVN, p < .05), a decrease of blood pressure (p < .05), lower ejection fraction (p < .05), and higher plasma level of biomarkers (NT‐proBNP, p < .001; Troponin, p < .05) in >1 W LoS subjects. 30‐day deceased subjects reported significantly higher levels of QTSD (p < .05), Te mean (p < .001), TeSD (p < .05), QTVN (p < .05) in comparison to the survivors. Multivariable Cox regression analysis reported that TeVN was a risk factor for longer hospital stay (hazard ratio: 1.04, 95% confidence limit: 1.01–1.08, p < .05); whereas, a longer Te mean was associated with higher mortality risk (hazard ratio: 1.02, 95% confidence limit: 1.01–1.03, p < .05). Conclusion A longer hospital stay is considered a clinical surrogate of CHF severity, we confirmed this finding. Therefore, these electrical and simple parameters could be used as noninvasive, transmissible, inexpensive markers of CHF severity and mortality.

Tpeak‐Tend ECG Marker in Obesity and Cardiovascular Diseases: A Comprehensive Review

“…It was also found that in patients with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), mean Tp-e and its standard deviation were higher than in those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) [ 82 ]. However, Son et al found no difference in Tp-e and Tp-e/QT ratio based on ejection fraction in three groups of heart failure patients (preserved, midrange, and reduced ejection fraction) [ 86 ].…”