2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-019-1006-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QTL mapping in Vigna radiata × Vigna umbellata population uncovers major genomic regions associated with bruchid resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the current study are concurrent with a recent report on the identification of QTL controlling bruchid resistance in V. radiata [ 94 ]. It was found that a major QTL containing various candidate genes such as R-gene families and TFs are responsible for bruchid defense in black gram.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The results of the current study are concurrent with a recent report on the identification of QTL controlling bruchid resistance in V. radiata [ 94 ]. It was found that a major QTL containing various candidate genes such as R-gene families and TFs are responsible for bruchid defense in black gram.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Percentage of (%) seed damage: Number of seeds damaged/Number of seeds taken × 100. Based on seed damage percent, the genotypes were categorized as highly resistant (0-10%), resistant (10.1-20%), moderately resistant (20.1-40%), susceptible (40.1-80%), and highly susceptible (80.1-100%) [10].…”
Section: Assay Methodology For Screening Mungbean Genotypes and Resis...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the insect pests, bruchids (Callosobruchus spp. Coleoptera, Bruchidae) are major insects causing severe damage to seeds in storage conditions [8][9][10]. The two most common species infecting mungbean seeds are Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) and Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With this prospect in mind, an attempt was made to differentiate noticeable characters between the potentially misidenti ed species commonly found in Southern India (especially Tamil Nadu), C. maculatus (Vir and Jindal 1981) and C. chinensis (Haines 1981; Khandwe et al 1997) with an aim to clear the doubts and di culties faced during species identi cation by those researchers (including the rst author during the initial research period) working on bruchid related research, except taxonomic studies, such as management, host plant resistance evaluation, inheritance of seed resistance studies, identi cation of molecular markers linked with the resistance, QTL mapping of the resistance gene in different pulses, etc. (Young et al 1993 Mariyammal et al 2019). Comparisons between certain striking morphological characters of these two bruchid species which will be useful in better and easy identi cation are made in regard to some of the original descriptions and subsequent published literatures, including those of the other rare Callosobruchus species found in India viz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%