Quali-quantitative methods beyond networks: Studying information diffusion on Twitter with the Modulation Sequencer

Abstract

Although the rapid growth of digital data and computationally advanced methods in the social sciences has in many ways exacerbated tensions between the so-called 'quantitative' and 'qualitative' approaches, it has also been provocatively argued that the ubiquity of digital data, particularly online data, finally allows for the reconciliation of these two opposing research traditions. Indeed, a growing number of 'qualitatively' inclined researchers are beginning to use computational techniques in more critical, reflexive and hermeneutic ways. However, many of these claims for 'quali-quantitative' methods hinge on a single technique: the network graph. Networks are relational, allow for the questioning of rigid categories and zooming from individual cases to patterns at the aggregate. While not refuting the use of networks in these studies, this paper argues that there must be other ways of doing quali-quantitative methods. We first consider a phenomenon which falls between quantitative and qualitative traditions but remains elusive to network graphs: the spread of information on Twitter. Through a case study of debates about nuclear power on Twitter, we develop a novel data visualisation called the modulation sequencer which depicts the spread of URLs over time and retains many of the key features of networks identified above. Finally, we reflect on the role of such tools for the project of quali-quantitative methods.

Viral Visualizations: How Coronavirus Skeptics Use Orthodox Data Practices to Promote Unorthodox Science Online

“…This paper pairs a quantitative approach to analyzing Twitter data (computer vision and network analysis) with a qualitative approach to examining Facebook Groups (digital ethnography). Drawing from social media scholarship that uses mixed-methods approaches to examine how users interact with one another [6,10,19,58,75], this paper engages with work critical of quantitative social media methods [9,103] by demonstrating how interpretive analyses of social media discussions and computational techniques can be mutually re-enforcing. In particular, we leverage quantitative studies of social media that use network analysis to understand political polarization [6], qualitative analysis of comments to identify changes in online dialogue over time [104], and visualization research that reverse-engineers and classifes chart images [88,104].…”

Johdanto: Yhteiskuntatieteiden ja informaatioteknologian rajapinnoilla

“…2017; Geiger & Ribes 2011), hyödyntämään erilaisia sosiaalisen massadatan muotoja (Kitchin 2014;Olshannikova ym. 2017) ja kehittämään monitieteistä vuoropuhelua erilaisten tieteenalataustojen ja osaamisprofiilien välillä (Halford & Savage 2017;Moats & Borra 2018). Tällainen toimintatapa tuottaa kumuloituvaa tietoa ja osaamista, joka voi kuitenkin olla pirstaloitunutta ja vaikeasti löydettävää; onkin epäselvää, miten hyvin näin hankittu osaaminen siirtyy tutkimusyhteisössä eteenpäin.…”

Digital Methods for Hashtag Engagement Research

“…This article thus proposes, from a standpoint of quali-quantitative methods (Latour et al, 2012; Moats & Borra, 2018; Venturini, 2010), an alternative perspective to addressing engagement in social media research; a call to embrace not only highly visible content, but also ordinary, less-visible content for the interpretation of hashtag-mediated actions.…”