2019
DOI: 10.17224/energagric.2018v33n4p303-312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualidade De Pellets De Galhos Secos De Araucária E Partículas De Pinus

Abstract: As grimpas de araucária, quando permanecem sem uso nos campos nativos, se constituem em um problema de sanidade animal para a atividade pecuária extensiva. Os resíduos da madeira de Pinus, largamente utilizada na indústria de base florestal no sul do Brasil, são a principal matéria-prima para a produção de pellets, no Brasil e no mundo. Assim, a análise da produção de pellets com estas duas matérias-primas pode ser uma alternativa para a utilização sustentada destes resíduos. O objetivo deste trabalho foi cara… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
3
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the average ash content was lower than the one observed by Brand et al (2018) (7.90%) in the same region and similar to the one obtained by Rios et al (2015) (5.13%). The dry branches' ash content can be considered high when compared to the wood with Pinus taeda bark, which varies from 0.4 to 0.6% (BRAND; DE MUNIZ, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Also, the average ash content was lower than the one observed by Brand et al (2018) (7.90%) in the same region and similar to the one obtained by Rios et al (2015) (5.13%). The dry branches' ash content can be considered high when compared to the wood with Pinus taeda bark, which varies from 0.4 to 0.6% (BRAND; DE MUNIZ, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The proximate analysis of the dry branches varied significantly over the year. The fixed carbon and the volatiles content was lower and higher than the ones observed by Brand et al (2018), 21.72% and 70.38%, respectively. Observing the analyzed properties, the ash content stood out.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations