2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-76433-3_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative Data and Approaches to Population–Environment Inquiry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand the population's perception of the causes of their vulnerability to floods, flash floods, and gullies, a qualitative approach was developed. Focus groups reveal collective perceptions, highlighting the point of view widely shared by the participants [92]. Twenty focus groups were organized between 23 November 2020 and 27 January 2021: 16 for floods and flash floods and 4 for gullying (Table 3) in 13 neighborhoods out of a hundred, targeted because they experienced a geo-hydrological hazard (Figure A1 and Table A1).…”
Section: Qualitative Data Through Focus Group Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the population's perception of the causes of their vulnerability to floods, flash floods, and gullies, a qualitative approach was developed. Focus groups reveal collective perceptions, highlighting the point of view widely shared by the participants [92]. Twenty focus groups were organized between 23 November 2020 and 27 January 2021: 16 for floods and flash floods and 4 for gullying (Table 3) in 13 neighborhoods out of a hundred, targeted because they experienced a geo-hydrological hazard (Figure A1 and Table A1).…”
Section: Qualitative Data Through Focus Group Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thematic analysis was used to identify recurrences, groupings, and contradictions in all the responses obtained (Paillé & MucchiellI, 2008). The analysis of the discourse is based on the manifest content, i.e., what the respondents said explicitly (Henry et al, 2022). The different respondents' answers were coded by their relevance related to the research questions.…”
Section: Discourse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%